Peter Voisey
On the 20th of October, 2006, Peter Voisey, a 35-year-old registered sex offender, borrowed his friend’s dark Vauxhall Astra and went out for a drive at about six in the evening.
At about the same time, a little 6-year-old girl was taking a bath in her parent’s home, playing with her toys the way a 6-year-old will at bath time. Her mother left the bathroom for a little while, convinced that her daughter was safe.
While in the living room, the mother heard her little girl say, in a calm voice, “What are you doing here?”
Shortly after, she heard the screech of car tires outside the house.
With a sinking feeling in her gut, she called out to her little girl.
There was no reply.
Twenty minutes later, a neighbor found the little girl, naked, bleeding and crying for her mother in a snow-covered alley about 300 yards from her house. He carried her home to her mother.
After questioning, the little girl revealed that a man had entered the bathroom and told her to be quiet or he’d hurt her and her mother. If she made a sound, he said, she would never see her family again.
He put his hand over her mouth, lifted her out of the bath and carried her to his waiting car.
Then he drove off.
After a while, the man stopped and touched her, with the girl describing what could only be called a sexual assault. The man repeated this a few minutes later.
The man told her that because she was good, he would let her go. He drove her to an alley, pushed her, still naked, out of the car and told her to face the wall.
Then he drove off.
Peter Voisey was immediately considered a person of interest in the abduction, being the convicted sexual predator and registered sexual offender that he was.
He had, in fact, been convicted of molesting a 12-year-old girl in the changing room of the Macclesfield Leisure Centre in 2001.
Despite repeated denials of any involvement, Peter Voisey’s home was searched. A diary was found with the entry on the day of the abduction reading; “Phew, it’s over, chill now.”
Peter Voisey claimed he was referring to Christmas.
Riiiiiight.
A footprint was left on the bathroom floor which matched a pair of tennis shoes belonging to Peter Voisey.
Police also discovered the remains of clothing that Peter had burned but that still matched the clothing the little girl had described her attacker wearing.
After his trial, Peter Voisey was given three life sentences.
Somehow I think society will manage without him.
If you’ve ever been a bit curious about someone you know, or wanted a little more information about someone’s background, here is an online background check service you can use to check up on someone without them knowing about it. There’s no monthly fee involved and no cancellation charge. Try it now.
Loading ...
12 Comments »
Sick fuck… this hit the headlines at the time here in the UK
how can an asshole like this get 3 LIFE sentences and other sick bastards only get 25 years for KILLING their own children ?? i HATE the system……..
wow…it’s actually justice for a pedo finally.
Thats cause your an Ausey and Peter Voisey is from the UK and Peter Whitmore was from Canada. 3 completely different countrys. 3 totaly different rules . Canada says life but they really mean 15 years but what there are really saying is 15 yeas but parole in 7 years soooo life means 7 years. kind of sorta.
Me, I like Mexico the best, for criminals. It really really sucks bad.
Look, while im totally stoked that this scum eater got what he deserves, why is it that he got three life sentences and Peter Whitmore got only seven years for his crimes?
I dont and never will understand the so called Justice System.
Indeed , woman from the land down under.
Ausey…thats so cute…only we prefer “Aussie.”
We need one worldwide sentence for child sex offenders – Death! Think of all the money the governments would save on Rehab courses that dont rehab anyone…the savings on food and lodging for these POS scum…
and the world would be a better place.
this nasty bastard son of a cunt fucker!!!!
how dare he do that to an innocent child! not only does he take her from home and assault her, but then push her out of the car naked and leave her in an alley? he should have gotten his stank ass castrated and tortured to death as a punishment! and wth is wrong with the mom? i know she must feel like trash and i;m sorry for pointing fingers, but the minute i heard my kid say something like “what are you doing here” when she’s supposed to be alone in the bath, i am picking up the nearest object that can be used like a weapon and running in to find out who the hell she’s talking to!
I agree with all that, but also…….I would like to say…..in 2006….LOCK YOUR DOORS. Prevention people. If you know the system won’t work for you, take it in your own hands….at least if the door had been locked he would have had to make noise to get the child, or maybe he would not have gotten the child.
This is what I was thinking. How could he have gotten into the house in the first place? And how did he know there was a young girl, how to find the bathroom, and not be seen? Maybe he knew the family or something.
If he did not know the family at all, it seems rather daring on his part. To find an unlocked house, get into the bathroom undetected, have the child actually remain quiet, get out of the house undetected, and go from there to the car with a naked or toweled child without being seen. It just seems like a lot of variables to me.
You’re right. Perhaps if they locked the door this wouldn’t have happened. Another reason I love my dogs (although I’ve taken to locking my door every time I come into the house). My dogs would let me know someone was there and they wouldn’t be too friendly to someone coming into our house that they didn’t know. I’m a huge dog advocate for this purpose: even if they don’t bite, most will let you know when someone is there.
He was referring to Christmas, in October? I hope life means life in this case.
I was wondering the same damn thing about the mother. I was wondering why she waited around to hear the tires screeching. I would have been on him like white on rice. lol.