Comments on: David Hawn and Steven L. Hawn http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/ Your daily dose of evil Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:00:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Matilda http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-128918 Matilda Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:39:58 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-128918 So according to you, it's totally ok for a 22 year old to have sex with a 13 year old, as long as "theyre luke so in luuuve"? So according to you, it’s totally ok for a 22 year old to have sex with a 13 year old, as long as “theyre luke so in luuuve”?

]]> By: RB http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-118157 RB Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:01:30 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-118157 Can I put my 2 cents in: Steven Hawn is a pedophile. David Hawn is a pedophile. Both of them deserve a one-way ticket to hell in the most painful way they can be sent there. Casey, I recommend a 2x4 applied to your head until you get a clue or you hear squishy sounds..... Can I put my 2 cents in:

Steven Hawn is a pedophile.
David Hawn is a pedophile.

Both of them deserve a one-way ticket to hell in the most painful way they can be sent there.

Casey, I recommend a 2×4 applied to your head until you get a clue or you hear squishy sounds…..

]]> By: Homer http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117199 Homer Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:28:24 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117199 XD!!!! XD!!!!

]]> By: Pam S http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117185 Pam S Sat, 24 Sep 2011 06:50:53 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117185 LMAO!!! LMAO!!!

]]> By: Aletheia http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117175 Aletheia Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:30:29 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117175 Sure, a 13-year-old can consent to sex. That's why statutory rape is considered a *slightly* less serious offense than forcible rape of a minor. Because the fact is, VERY few (if any) people of that age, in this society at least, have the emotional and social maturity to make intelligent decisions about sex. Adults are supposed to know better and have more control of their impulses than that. There's nothing disgusting or perverted per se about feeling a sexual attraction to a post-pubescent adolescent; secondary sexual characteristics are very alluring, and attraction is a very primal thing. What's disgusting is when an adult allows carnal lust to override his (or her) maturity and think it's okay to act on the attraction just because it exists. And we're not even talking about mid- to late teens here, we're talking about girls of 12 or 13 years who may not even have finished developing physically yet. Girls that age tend to be cute and full of romance, not sexually aggressive. Even if she was flirting with him, a man who can't resist the tentative overtures of a child that age isn't just weak-willed, he is SICK. At any rate, according to the victim in this case, there was at least some element of manipulation or coercion involved. And these assholes didn't even care enough about this girl's health and well-being to take precautions against pregnancy. There are no excuses here. This isn't a borderline case, or a thought-provoking case that raises interesting questions about maturity and consent. This is about predatory behavior, pure and simple. Sure, a 13-year-old can consent to sex. That’s why statutory rape is considered a *slightly* less serious offense than forcible rape of a minor. Because the fact is, VERY few (if any) people of that age, in this society at least, have the emotional and social maturity to make intelligent decisions about sex. Adults are supposed to know better and have more control of their impulses than that. There’s nothing disgusting or perverted per se about feeling a sexual attraction to a post-pubescent adolescent; secondary sexual characteristics are very alluring, and attraction is a very primal thing. What’s disgusting is when an adult allows carnal lust to override his (or her) maturity and think it’s okay to act on the attraction just because it exists. And we’re not even talking about mid- to late teens here, we’re talking about girls of 12 or 13 years who may not even have finished developing physically yet. Girls that age tend to be cute and full of romance, not sexually aggressive. Even if she was flirting with him, a man who can’t resist the tentative overtures of a child that age isn’t just weak-willed, he is SICK. At any rate, according to the victim in this case, there was at least some element of manipulation or coercion involved. And these assholes didn’t even care enough about this girl’s health and well-being to take precautions against pregnancy. There are no excuses here. This isn’t a borderline case, or a thought-provoking case that raises interesting questions about maturity and consent. This is about predatory behavior, pure and simple.

]]> By: Pam S http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117173 Pam S Sat, 24 Sep 2011 01:50:39 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117173 Seriously, I really think it may be true?! Seriously, I really think it may be true?!

]]> By: NavyCop http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117160 NavyCop Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:23:09 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117160 Hey, I heard his old man is, too! Hey, I heard his old man is, too!

]]> By: Maelstrom http://pysih.com/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117153 Maelstrom Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:40:25 +0000 http://66.197.131.105/2007/07/31/david-hawn-and-steven-l-hawn/#comment-117153 Ha ha...no, no..couldn't be. Not Steven Hawn. Ha ha…no, no..couldn’t be. Not Steven Hawn.

]]>