People You’ll See In Hell

Get updates by e-mail. Free!
Why subscribe?

  • More information on why subscribing to an online background check service is a good idea:



  • Suzette Stevenson and Jamie Lynn Martin

    Suzette StevensonRegardless of what you may think you see before you, this is not Boss Hogg.

    This is 45-year-old Suzette Stevenson, the larger half of a lesbian life-partner pair.

    Now, many people have pretty strong opinions on whether homosexual couples should be able to adopt and raise children or not.

    Some people think homosexuals are evil. Other people think homosexuals are just like other folks, except that they make excellent espresso and great pancakes.

    Although the possibility exists that they do make decent pancakes, the world can now be certain that Suzette Stevenson and Jamie Lynn Martin are really bad parents.

    For a while, Suzette Stevenson and Jamie Lynn Martin were taking care of a boy together.

    The boy wasn’t really theirs in any legal sense of the word. They just kind of…well…had him there. Like if you went to the park, found a puppy and took it home.

    This kid, who was born in 2000, was taken away from his druggie mother by the court system and given to his father, who gave him to an aunt who was in a lesbian relationship with Suzette Stevenson.

    Jamie Lynn MartinThat aunt died and Suzette sort of adopted the child, at one point buying a forged birth certificate and attempting to pass the boy off as her own when she moved to Florida in September of 2005 in order to start a relationship with Jamie Lynn Martin, who she met on the Internet.

    She might have been better off using a criminal background check service to check Jamie Martin’s background.

    Love makes the world go ’round after all.

    Unless, of course, you’re a little seven-year-old boy who is being treated like an animal by two adults who have no business having you in their home - two adults who tie your wrists together and force you to stand for hours, or who burn you with cigarettes, or who force you to drink shampoo.

    Unless, of course, you’re a little seven-year-old boy who is kicked out of daycare because he’s so hungry that he steals food from his playmates.

    And it’s not like the child’s schoolteacher would ever notice that he was hungry, because once he was kicked out of the daycare, Suzette Stevenson didn’t send him back to school in the fall.

    Suzette Stevenson and Jamie Lynn Martin’s lack of parenting skills came to the attention of authorities when, after telling the child that they would take him to Disney World if he was a good boy, they instead drove to a timeshare that was holding an open house and giving away $100 if people would sit through the presentation.

    That wouldn’t in and of itself be so bad (although if you’ve been to one of those presentations you might disagree) but after threatening the child with a box cutter and forcing him to take a sleeping pill, the gruesome twosome left the very hungry boy in the car and told him to go to sleep.

    Unfortunately for Suzette Stevenson and Jamie Lynn Martin, the boy didn’t go to sleep. He wandered on into the open house and started asking people for food where someone with some sense called the authorities. The police and Social Services showed up and, after interviewing the boy and everyone else involved, decided that Suzette and Jamie Lynn should be in jail for a bit.

    Once the pressure was on, Jamie Lynn turned on Suzette, telling the authorities that Stevenson kept the boy out of school because she was afraid that his injuries would be seen and reported. Suzette also turned on Martin, informing the authorities that Jamie Lynn never liked the boy because his biological parents were each from different races.

    The child?

    For a while, he was in critical condition. He is, however, expected to recover.

    According to Baker County Sheriff Joey Dobson:

    In my 35 years on the job, I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a child that’s been abused in so many ways he has.

    Do Suzette Stevenson and Jamie Lynn Martin deserve Hell?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Spread the word about this article!

    Del.icio.usDiggRedditStumbleUpon

    Similar Posts:


    12 Responses to “Suzette Stevenson and Jamie Lynn Martin”

    1. comment number 1 by: IPattyKake

      I just dont understand how people can treat children so badly.

      [Reply]

    2. comment number 2 by: Brittany

      Man, that’s gonna give us lesbians a bad rap. not cool, not cool

      [Reply]

    3. comment number 3 by: Anon.

      Don’t worry Brittany. I’ll still like you lesbians all the same. I mean how else can I get my kicks? By watching heterosexuals couples? Pfft, who does that anymore?

      Seriously though, that’s really a poor situation, and as mentioned will set up a preface for others to use against same sex couples in their bigoted little worlds.

      [Reply]

    4. comment number 4 by: DualDenz

      ok, i don’t mean to offend, but when i first saw the picture, i thought it was a guy….. (the name confused me as well). if she didn’t want the kid, why didn’t she give him up? the kid wasn’t even supposed to be with her in the first place.

      [Reply]

    5. comment number 5 by: Brittany

      Thanks Anon… it’s like the whole AIDS thing because “that was started by a gay guy” It’s bad enough that there are enough sterotypes and shit and enough condemming people for being gay then there’s these total, like TOTAL lesbians making headlines doing this shit.

      Watch, Rev Phelps (that prick) will get involved in this one too. I’m sure there is already something on his website about it. I refuse to check so if you want to you can… http://www.godhatesfags.com (cocksucker)

      [Reply]

    6. comment number 6 by: DualDenz

      don’t waste your anger on an idiot like rev Phelps, he’s probably gay himself anyway ;)

      [Reply]

    7. comment number 7 by: Brittany

      oh, believe me, I won’t. It’s kind of nice that you know of him. Not many people do.

      [Reply]

    8. comment number 8 by: ells9824

      Oh I’m well acquainted with the good(haha)rever. He set up a lil diversion at my cousin’s funeral. Thankfully,no one really noticed ;)

      [Reply]

    9. comment number 9 by: Anon.

      Don’t mean to bicker of semantics Brittany, but actually a large number of people are aware of Mr. Phelps and his Family Church. And their picketing of soldier’s funerals and their bigoted views.

      They own and operate quite a few websites, the one you linked only being the most prevalent. ‘Fraid the scariest thing is they are actually serious about what they say. That really is scary.

      [Reply]

    10. comment number 10 by: DualDenz

      What’s even scarier is that there’s a group of people that agree with him…..
      thank god there’s not a lot of them though (still too many of course)

      [Reply]

    11. comment number 11 by: Brittany

      Thats true. It just seems as though whenever I mention him people become clueless. I first heard of him during the Matthew Shepard case back in 98. Granted I was only 11 then, it still disgusted me. Then a few years ago when he petitioned to get the statue of Matt’s head with a blasting bible verse. It’s nice to see that you guys know who he is as well. And yes, it’s a scary shameful thing that he does have people who agree with him and feel the same way.

      [Reply]

    12. comment number 12 by: Jayni

      Wow, that is kind of sad. I hope the poor kid is okay now. =0)

      [Reply]

    Join the Discussion - Leave a Reply:

    Name

    Mail (never published)

    Website