Being the self-centered egotistical bastards that we are, from time to time (all the time, actually) we here at PYSIH.com like to wander around the Internet, looking for comments and conversations about us.
One in particular stood out.
Read the thread here. It’s on the Randi.org forum, on James Randi’s website.
One member, UserGoogol, had this to say about PYSIH.com:
I think that blog excessively demonizes anally molesting newborn babies to death. I mean don’t get me wrong, you really really shouldn’t anally molest newborn babies, but really it’s not as bad as they say. Newborn babies can barely grasp the idea that there is a world beyond their nose, let alone that they are being raped. Anally raping newborn babies is therefore not significantly worse than any other way of killing newborn babies.
Also, I still totally oppose the death penalty. Killing him isn’t going to bring the baby back, thus the only good that can come out of punishment is in preventing future crimes, through deterrence or removal from society or whatever. I think that the set of people who would anally molest babies if the penalty was lots of time in jail but who would change their mind only when the death penalty comes into mind would be insanely small, and similarly I think that. To say that he should be killed simply because he is worthless scum is just spite for spite’s sake.
Another conversation can be found at WhoFailedToday.com (which is a pretty damn cool name for a website, if you ask me)
Here’s a conversation about us on CBS’s Sportsline Forum.
The Internet is an interesting place.
Spread the word about this article!
Similar Posts:
oh please, that’s a clear case of forum trolling. In my many years of trolling myself, i’ve gotten quite the nose for them.
That changes nothing about the fact that the internet is indeed full of interesting people.
[Reply]
Freedom of speech should sometimes require an adult to “proofread” (i.e. make sure the person making the remark isn’t a social retard) before they are allowed to express their dumbass comment. Since when is anally raping an infant “…not as bad as they say”? Would “they” be the part of the population who doesn’t have to have all sharp instruments placed in a basket before visitations?
[Reply]
see again Lori fucking Drew. I think it’s doing her more good than bad. EVERYONE’s talking about her. She’s probably used to it though…from High School and all.
[Reply]
Anally raping an infant baby is “not as bad as they say”? I can’t believe what I’ve just read.
He’s right, an infant DOESN’T even know what’s going on - but that makes it worse. A poor child is defenseless and can do nothing to help themselves. It’s like torturing and then killing a poor little puppy. The animal doesn’t understand what’s happening, but still feels and goes through the pain.
Besides, what is equally bad is the fact that a mature, grown man would anally rape an infant. HE knows what he’s doing, and yet he does it anyway - seriously, some people are so messed up.
[Reply]
i agree angrier citizen
[Reply]
The blog above was probably written by a guy who has done the anal baby raping himself. No one else could possibly think (much less broadcast) that something like this is “not that bad”.
[Reply]
i think he is some loser that has nothin better to do then to write this crap just to piss people off!!thats all hes tryin to do…he wants to see how many people will react…thats just my apinion…im not gonna give him the satisfaction…
[Reply]
lolz
[Reply]