Is there anything about raping and strangulation that is benevolent or common or usual? Why should a perp be given consideration that a victim was not?

Or, maybe beyond that, what exactly about whatever method of execution could be considered ‘cruel or unusual’? At what point does comparative logic come in?

Rape/strangulation vs no rape/quick, painless death by injection? Cruel vs non-cruel?

Death after rape/strangulation… unusual?
Death because you raped/strangled someone…usual?

Maybe we just need to execute more POSs so that nobody can claim that it’s unusual to be exterminated if you rape/strangle?

Maybe we should offer execution by injection of syphilis, rabies, HIV?… or better yet, offer execution via rape/strangulation, and let the perp choose between that or a cruel death by painless, immediate injection?

Saying that death by injection is cruel is problematic, since every single animal shelter that is not so backwoods as to gas, decompress or shoot their unwanted pets uses injection, and everyone agrees that it is painless and less cruel. Where I live, the SPCA injects upwards of 3,000 unwanted pets PER MONTH.

IMO-
Cruel- killing animals, whatever method, who have committed no crime other than not being loved or cared for by a person enough to be ‘wanted’.

Not cruel- killing people who hurt, abuse and kill other people… not matter what method is used.

Someone needs to clue me in on what the criteria for ‘cruel’ or ‘unusual’ is regarding execution, and why how cruel or unusual the perp’s treatment of the victim has no relation to that.

c

Or, if I were to be hit by a car and killed instantly vs being mortally injured, guaranteed to die, and have it be painful, I would choose the quick-trip.

But, even if I had some terminal disease where I was definitely going to die within a time frame, BUT I couild take meds that would make it more tolerable, because I rather enjoy being alive. I’m not one of those people who would want to be dead just because I was in a wheelchair, or physically limited in some way, or was in moderate long-term pain. I have chronic long-term pain anyway that is no fun, but I’ve found that being alive kind of makes it worthwhile. I don’t think I would want to be alive if I could not either read or communicate.

I’ve found that the deepest feelings people usually have are for the people they love, or that they used to love or be loved by. That’s why so many people say they would like their ex to suffer. It sometimes is a reflection of how much you care or cared at some point for the person. Rarely do people want an ex that they really didn’t love/like all that much to suffer, because they weren’t really important overall, and there’s no intense leftover feelings. Usually you just forget about those people.

That is what I would like for abusers/rapists/murderers. To just die now and disappear. Because they are not important. Torturing them or making them suffer still allows them the luxury of life, and there are many examples of people who have had torturous circumstances, such as being in deathcamps, where they have proven that it is possible to still get something positive out of being alive. Anne Frank’s journal, and the book The Hiding Place are very good examples of people being able to do that.

And, in my opinion, evil people do not deserve to find any enjoyment out of being alive, even if it’s just observing a little ant scavenging food on their cell floor. They don’t even deserve to enjoy that. They don’t deserve to have whatever perverted conversation they might have with a cellmate, or if alone, they don’t even deserve to be able to go into their own head and relive whatever good times they might have had in their life.
Supposedly, science has proven that it actually helps the giver when people volunteer or do charity, so I don’t think POS should be allowed to ‘turn into a good person who helps others in jail’ and eventually gets released, like the POS that that recently got out after having participated in killing , torturing, sodomizing and ultimitely burning a preteen simply because she liked the same girl one of her killers liked. Even if she turned into Mother Theresa, which I doubt, she still does not deserve the personal satisfaction that you get by helping other people. I don’t think she should even have been given the opportunity to have eaten crappy prison food, chew it up, shit it out… masturbate in her cell…. all things that when everything else is taken away can actually be enjoyable to some degree.

Obviously, I think all POSs should get a quick trial instead of a long, drawn out offense, and then, unless their actions did not directly involve or cause a death or directly contribute to it, they should be immediately sentenced to death. And, killed within the year. I’ve made it clear before that I think all death row convicts should be provided with the means to commit suicide so that nobody else has to be involved with their sorry asses. They could redeem themselves by offing themselves immediately. Save our tax money, and instantly make the world a better place by their absence.

I am hopeful that gains in DNA and science will soon make this a possibility without the possibility of having convicted the wrong person.

c

given a choice, i rather die from natural course.
i hope this guy doesn’t though.