Get updates by e-mail. Free!
Why subscribe?

PYSIH twitter
Follow Us on Twitter

  • Top Commentators

    • vcbecky
    • Mulch
    • NavyCop
    • V.XIII
    • Max The Cat
    • E
    • Steph-Ann
    • Jason
    • Deedeebug95
    • stormy weathers
  • More information on why subscribing to an online background check service is a good idea:

  • Special thanks to BeeMedia, who have never killed anyone, as far as we know.

    Check out this excellent guide to building your own website.



    Andrew Kowalczyk

    Andrew Kowalczyk33-year-old Andrew Kowalczyk isn’t someone you would want your daughter (or son) to bring home to you.

    Why is that, do you ask?

    Well, for starters, Andrew Kowalczyk has a lengthy criminal history, complete with gun and assault charges.

    Then there’s the matter of his living in a motel, making a living by using his computer to forge checks, make fake ids and practicing his identity theft skills – and being arrested for it on the 27th of December, 2007.

    Then of course, you’d be dealing with a guy who’s into child pornography.

    That’d probably be the kicker, really.

    Police, who were serving a search warrant at Andrew Kowalczyk’s motel room following his arrest for identity theft, found a wide assortment of pictures which were described as “heinous” – pictures of children who ranged in age from 2 to 8 years old.

    The child pornography pictures were obviously taken in a particular hotel room, and the police are currently trying to track down which one.

    It’s believed that the children live in Oregon or Washington.


    LifeLock Identity Theft Prevention - Save 10%
    Knowing which hotel room was used to create this kiddy porn could help the authorities find the children who were involved, which would be good because they’re obviously in a somewhat dangerous situation.

    Also found were pictures of four women, who are possibly connected in some way to the children featured in the child pornography. The unspoken opinion is that these women are probably the mothers of the children involved in the kiddy porn.

    Andrew Kowalczyk was taken to jail, charged with identity theft and forgery. Possession of child pornography will be next on the list, followed by charges of manufacturing child pornography if Andrew is, indeed, found to be responsible.

    Does Andrew Kowalczyk deserve Hell?

    • Yes (91%, 191 Votes)
    • No (9%, 19 Votes)

    Total Voters: 210

    Loading ... Loading ...


    20 Comments »

    Similar Posts:

    20 Responses to “Andrew Kowalczyk”

    1. CDR says:

      Fry bastard

    2. DualDenz says:

      not much to say about this guy really, although the accumulated crimes are impressive. haven’t seen many on here that commited that many.

    3. michelle says:

      If the kids moms were involved? I am sickened even more.
      They should all go to HELL!
      Parents letting that happen to their offspring.
      DISGUSTING!

    4. Fred says:

      Such a POS would best serve society as fertalizer, such POS usually have the resources to have them back on the streets way too soon.

      I am glad that fact that the mothers may be involved was included. Men are not the only ones that can be monsters; not every bad person is a man

    5. Brittany says:

      ok now wait!! The story doesn’t say that the mothers were involved with the kiddy porn, you just jumped to that conclusion.

      If anything, as far as their involvement, could’ve been friends of this guy and that was the link to their kids. Maybe they wanted to go get their nails done and they asked him to watch them. Maybe they needed some money so they laundered their children. Who exactly knows the degree of the involvement?

      As far as the amount of crime notches on his belt, it’s quite a random selection, but oh well.

      • petesake says:

        are you that niave that you cannot see a link between these children and complicet mothers,who’s need for money outweighs any moral obligation to there kids?.if you think of the worst thing a mother/person can do,then X 10 and you could be halfway there to understanding what humans are capable of.

    6. GloryBug says:

      Laundered? I don’t understand that part.

      c

    7. admin says:

      I do not understand laundering children.

      I usually put mine in the backyard and just hose them off once a week.

    8. Brittany says:

      Maybe I got ahead of myself and used the wrong word. Let me think of something else. Thought that was the right word. You know when something sounds right in your head. Sorry.

      Let’s use trafficed

    9. Brittany says:

      I don’t think that was spelt right either. OH well you get my point.

    10. Ed SmithCo says:

      Why did this country ever get rid of the electric chair, firing squad or the good old fashion rope?? We somehow feel a need to make death easer on scum like this. Personally I would torture him to death.

    11. Kay says:

      If those mothers were at all involved in this ordeal, they deserve to burn too.

    12. DualDenz says:

      i don’t have a reliable source for this information, but as far as i’m aware, mother’s selling their kids to molesters, or just “renting” them out to these monsters are unfortunatly a reality. crackheads or other drug fiends that need the money for their next hit letting some monster have their way with a child, a sickening thought, happens :(

    13. GloryBug says:

      Brittany- LOL. I was really scratching my head, wondering if I was just not hip to some sew jargon. Trafficking makes more sense, yes.

      Admin- (eek) I, too, have been guilty of hosing my boys down outside. I have never put them in the dryer, however.

      c

    14. GloryBug says:

      sew=new. Sheesh.

      c

    15. Fred says:

      Spork his eyeballs out! Then toss him into the prison’s septic tank.

    16. Lorrie says:

      My brother is one of the men who’s identity was stolen by this man, so he can rot in hell for that!! and for the “mothers”, they are all sick pieces of crap if they put their children in that situation!!

    17. hazzard2myself says:

      EEWWW Straight to HELL for him

    18. AgJu says:

      “33-year-old Andrew Kowalczyk isn’t someone you would want your daughter (or son) to bring home to you.”

      Tee hee. Thanks for including the whole rainbow admin, but even us gays wouldn’t want someone like him. His forehead’s too big. :)

      Oh and there’s the whole crime and child pornography thing. That probably WOULD be a deal-breaker. :p

    Leave a Reply