Comments on: Frank McCowan

By: Max The Cat

Max The Cat — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:26:42 +0000

You didn’t miss much Mum – Just a bunch of psychobabble and gobbledygoop

By: Mum of 2

Mum of 2 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:05:16 +0000

This even may be a stellar post, but without any proper paragraphs and no existent indentation, I refuse to read it.

Incidentally, I think Turtlemania’s: can I pee on him first?” +
posts are fucking hilarious.

By: Mum of 2

Mum of 2 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:01:08 +0000

I have just read on this site that raping and beating your own infant can be somehow legally adapted and minced down to ” Attempted child abuse”, ( Kirk asswipe Coleman)
SO,
NO, I do not believe that being CONVICTED of RAPING A CHALLENGED ADULT deserves any sort of doubt concerning what this piece of shit had in mind for this 5 year old boy.
He should still be locked up. Or preferably, diced and sliced.
And please, add GO TO hell for the shits who let the 5 year old leave with him.

By: wondermom

wondermom — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:53:26 +0000

Sorry Meaghan, but I havta disagree on this one. Any POS that tried to “accidentally” walk off with one of my kids (or someone else’s, as opposed to the standard of this ladies’ dimwitted self-centered braindead friends.) would find himself standing there wondering why:
A.) I am making such a frowny face, and
B.) I am holding his detached scrotal sack in my hand.

If the attempt included forcible entry into my hunble lil’ abode, he’d also get my Samuri sword straight to the larnyx.
Fuck benefit of the doubt. Weirdos abound. Shoot first, ask questions later.

By: Frozen

Frozen — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:57:35 +0000

Hahahah, which led to a good solid tasering.. Lmao, Admin, you are pretty funny.

By: Bigfoot

Bigfoot — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:30:11 +0000

Incidentally, GloryBug, I am somewhat at a loss to answer your very well thought out questions in such short order. Your processing speed is incredible. If you’d like to correspond, I’ll set up a Yahoo or IM account to discuss these ideas, I’d love to show this thread to my supervisor at work. Good Luck and so long for now. I’m always the first to question my own assumptions, please feel free to disagree!!!I hope this at least gives some food for thought. Best regards, Bigfoot in Washington State.

By: Bigfoot

Bigfoot — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:21:12 +0000

One of the standard criteria for assessing whether or not a child’s behaviors are indeed significant enough to warrant consideration as being pathological is knowledge of sexually related information beyond normative expectations for the age of the child; or innapropriate touching/or attempted sexual contact with adults, other children, or particularly, observed sexual contact with other children of an appreciable (2-3 yrs?) age difference from the child whose behavior is evaluated. Sexually agressive individuals (adults, youth, children) are just that- sexually agressive, and will generally respond to situations as circumstances allow. A responsible, mature adult, or even another child who has been taught appropriate physical boundary definitions, will calmly and discreetly redirect the child’s behavior without shaming the child, and bring attention to the behavior at an appropriate time. (Right then if possible, if not , as soon as competent counselor or parent/parent surrogate can be present, preferably a combination of both) An individual with predatory inclinations will likely act out whatever intentions the circumstances allow. In other words, the kid in Boulder was very fortunate that something (mom coming back) interrupted the completion of of the predator’s likely intentional trajectory. (Again, mostly textbook regurgitation- but I agree) As far as the attraction issues, this goes beyond compulsion to paraphilia- an objectified person or thing takes the place of the normative subject of the predator’s sexual interest. This could be a young person, old person, child, shoe, ferret, sheep, etc.- you get my drift. Instead of affection and generative love, the object is used for gratification of desire, then discarded or abandoned. The obsessive component is again evident, as this can only be a destructive as opposed to generative relationship. Bigfoot
PS Perception of risk/risk factor can be in the eye of the beholder. Any objectified foal point could be a target of sexual agression. Again, person, fetish, whatever.

By: GloryBug

GloryBug — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:27:34 +0000

Bigfoot- thank you for that explanation. I wonder if it shouldn’t be expanded somewhat for children?

““At risk” adults, like “at risk” children, are those who have reduced or impaired mental (or physical, or both) functions resulting in behavior that would place them in a higher risk category than a “normal” child or adult.”

For example, 2 years ago a little girl in my oldest boy’s GATE (gifted and talented education program) spent a lot of time at my house. Her single mother and she lived in a motel, and she was very intelligent. But, she was very needy. Her mother often asked to have her spend the night while she stayed out all night on ‘dates’. I really liked her, and she was a joy to be around. At the same time, she was very needy, and I thought she was very vulnerable to being abused/molested. She knew a bit more about anatomy than I thought she should at the time.

So, could the at-risk child also mean one who is not mentally more disadvantaged than a ‘normal’ child, and simply be one who has been put in situations by the adults in their life that could be dangerous for them? Or would that not be considered? Is there a standard definition of an ‘at risk child’?

I’m also curious if a person who’d been convicted of abusing an at-risk adult also be attracted to much younger children because of the developmental age rather than the physical age?

You seem to know a lot about some of these things. Was this girl not molested because the POS wasn’t attracted to little girls, or was it because he and his friends just hadn’t had enough time to pull it off? If someone was attracted to ‘at risk adults’, would they also be attracted to non at risk adults?