Comments on: Frank McCowan

By: bengalpuss29

bengalpuss29 — Mon, 07 May 2012 04:14:17 +0000

Luckily the boy was found before anything sinister happened to him. And the friends that did nothing, i would personally slap each one of them, because they let the most important thing in my life get led away, and god knows what would’ve happened if that mother hadn’t have acted so quickly. We would probably be reading one of pysih’s articles about a child that was murdered by a pedaphile. He was interrupted this time, next time he may just get to do exactly what he planned to do this time but was interrupted thank god.

By: Max The Cat

Max The Cat — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:26:42 +0000

You didn’t miss much Mum – Just a bunch of psychobabble and gobbledygoop

By: Mum of 2

Mum of 2 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:05:16 +0000

This even may be a stellar post, but without any proper paragraphs and no existent indentation, I refuse to read it.

Incidentally, I think Turtlemania’s: can I pee on him first?” +
posts are fucking hilarious.

By: Mum of 2

Mum of 2 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:01:08 +0000

I have just read on this site that raping and beating your own infant can be somehow legally adapted and minced down to ” Attempted child abuse”, ( Kirk asswipe Coleman)
SO,
NO, I do not believe that being CONVICTED of RAPING A CHALLENGED ADULT deserves any sort of doubt concerning what this piece of shit had in mind for this 5 year old boy.
He should still be locked up. Or preferably, diced and sliced.
And please, add GO TO hell for the shits who let the 5 year old leave with him.

By: wondermom

wondermom — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:53:26 +0000

Sorry Meaghan, but I havta disagree on this one. Any POS that tried to “accidentally” walk off with one of my kids (or someone else’s, as opposed to the standard of this ladies’ dimwitted self-centered braindead friends.) would find himself standing there wondering why:
A.) I am making such a frowny face, and
B.) I am holding his detached scrotal sack in my hand.

If the attempt included forcible entry into my hunble lil’ abode, he’d also get my Samuri sword straight to the larnyx.
Fuck benefit of the doubt. Weirdos abound. Shoot first, ask questions later.

By: Frozen

Frozen — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:57:35 +0000

Hahahah, which led to a good solid tasering.. Lmao, Admin, you are pretty funny.

By: Bigfoot

Bigfoot — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:30:11 +0000

Incidentally, GloryBug, I am somewhat at a loss to answer your very well thought out questions in such short order. Your processing speed is incredible. If you’d like to correspond, I’ll set up a Yahoo or IM account to discuss these ideas, I’d love to show this thread to my supervisor at work. Good Luck and so long for now. I’m always the first to question my own assumptions, please feel free to disagree!!!I hope this at least gives some food for thought. Best regards, Bigfoot in Washington State.

By: Bigfoot

Bigfoot — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:21:12 +0000

One of the standard criteria for assessing whether or not a child’s behaviors are indeed significant enough to warrant consideration as being pathological is knowledge of sexually related information beyond normative expectations for the age of the child; or innapropriate touching/or attempted sexual contact with adults, other children, or particularly, observed sexual contact with other children of an appreciable (2-3 yrs?) age difference from the child whose behavior is evaluated. Sexually agressive individuals (adults, youth, children) are just that- sexually agressive, and will generally respond to situations as circumstances allow. A responsible, mature adult, or even another child who has been taught appropriate physical boundary definitions, will calmly and discreetly redirect the child’s behavior without shaming the child, and bring attention to the behavior at an appropriate time. (Right then if possible, if not , as soon as competent counselor or parent/parent surrogate can be present, preferably a combination of both) An individual with predatory inclinations will likely act out whatever intentions the circumstances allow. In other words, the kid in Boulder was very fortunate that something (mom coming back) interrupted the completion of of the predator’s likely intentional trajectory. (Again, mostly textbook regurgitation- but I agree) As far as the attraction issues, this goes beyond compulsion to paraphilia- an objectified person or thing takes the place of the normative subject of the predator’s sexual interest. This could be a young person, old person, child, shoe, ferret, sheep, etc.- you get my drift. Instead of affection and generative love, the object is used for gratification of desire, then discarded or abandoned. The obsessive component is again evident, as this can only be a destructive as opposed to generative relationship. Bigfoot
PS Perception of risk/risk factor can be in the eye of the beholder. Any objectified foal point could be a target of sexual agression. Again, person, fetish, whatever.