This is 23-year-old Dwayne Scott Smail.
Not only is this a picture of Dwayne Scott Smail, this is a picture of Dwayne Scott Smail at his initial court appearance after being charged in the shooting death of 19-month-old Korbyn Williams.
Dwayne Scott Smail lives with his girlfriend Aimee Marie Williams and her 19 month-old daughter, Korbyn Eva May Williams. Dwayne Scott Smail reportedly felt threatened enough to warrant the keeping of a 9 mm Ruger hand gun just within his reach at all times. Dwayne Scott Smail ignored previous warnings from Ms. Williams to keep the weapon put up after finding her young child with the loaded weapon in her hand. Add all this to the fact that Smail did not respect his girlfriend’s wishes or her child’s life enough to keep the loaded gun from her reach, and please note that this gun also had no safety on it.
Before going to sleep Dwayne Scott Smail placed a 9 mm pistol on a portion of his bed’s box spring and drifted off to dreamland with nary a concern for the small child he was caring for. Dwayne Smail awoke to find young Korbyn trying to gain his attention.
In Korbyn’s hand (reportedly) was the 9 mm Ruger Pistol.
Dwayne Smail claims to have tried to gain possession of the gun from the youngster but the gun went off killing Korbyn. A desperate fight ensued between the 23-year-old man and the toddler, but Korbyn was apparently strong enough to maintain control of the hand gun and shoot herself in the head.
According to Smail that is.
Any logical person would question several parts of Dwayne Smail’s story and, as some of the more logical members of society, Investigators do not believe that young Korbyn Williams was holding the gun that killed her.
Dwayne Smail also allegedly went to Aimee Williams workplace to tell her what happened to her young child prior to calling 911 to the scene of the crime accident.
One would think that any concerned parent or proxy thereof would immediately call for assistance from the police and medical professionals, which makes Dwayne Smail’s first stop a little baffling. Of course that is only to those of us who are unable to wrap our minds around the shooting death of a young, innocent child.
Had Aimee Williams completed a background check on her beloved Dwayne, she would have seen that Mr. Dwayne Smail has a history of violence. Previous convictions include a misdemeanor assault in 2003, and partner assault in 2004. Had Aimee Williams learned of these prior convictions perhaps she would have thought twice about leaving her 19 month-old daughter with this man. Maybe she would have thought twice but then again, don’t they say that love is blind?
Moms with children and live-in boyfriends can find out anything about anyone using NetDetective to do online background checks. Just $29 will buy you a three year subscription to NetDetective databases. Educate yourself with NetDetective background checks and keep your friends and loved ones safe.
Loading …
Similar Posts:
Who the hell makes a gun with no safety these days?
[Reply]
It might have been an old, dirty gun instead a new, bright, shiny gun.
[Reply]
Maybe the truth is that this child’s real father is an Al-Quadia member, and he should be treated like a hero!
I’ll bet that the milk was probably out of the baby’s reach! After all she should not be able to make a bowl of cereal without proper supervision.
Such a nice person would not lie????
BULLSHIT - maybe the child did get a hold of his gun and the child could have shot herself, but whose fault is all this? The child’s? At 19 months old, the child still shits in his/her pants - they do not have enough sense to use a toilet, so placing a loaded firearm within reach and whatever happens is the fault of the adult, not the child
[Reply]
We are all taught at an early age not to play with guns, and to always assume the gun is loaded.
The article clearly states that the baby had a history of playing with loaded weapons.
Maybe Ms. Williams did request that Mr. Smail put the gun under lock and key, but she was the one being disrespectful, not only of Mr. Smail, but of all god-fearing gun owners.
Mr. Smail has a constitutional right and a moral obligation to protect himself with a gun from any harm that may befall him.
Children hit, pull hair, and poke people all the time. I applaud Mr. Smail for defending himself against this type of domestic abuse.
Babies beware, we’re not going to take it anymore.
[Reply]
Aimee reply on March 28, 2008:
i am the mother and my baby did not play with loaded guns maybe you should get your facts straight. this hard enough without people like you leaveing comments like this. ask me anything and i well tell you dont just assume things
[Reply]
Miwist…you are about a stupid fuck. Your attempt at humor has gotten on my last nerve. I’m sure I’m not alone when I say…sit down and shut the fuck up.
[Reply]
Miwist reply on March 17, 2008:
Belle, you’re not alone. My wife says the same thing constantly.
[Reply]
Meaghan reply on March 19, 2008:
I actually thought that was kind of funny.
[Reply]
Wow, kind of sad. Even though it may have been an accident, he should have put it somewhere that a child could not get to.
[Reply]
DualDenz reply on March 17, 2008:
yeah, like in the care of police or the milairy………..
[Reply]
Dr. Extreme reply on March 17, 2008:
I plan to own a gun when I become an adult.
UNTIL I get children. As soon as my wife/significant other gets pregnant, I will take that mo-fo out to the garage, and hit it with a sledgehammer till it resembles modern art.
[Reply]
Dr. Extreme reply on March 17, 2008:
Or if I marry someone with children, or babysit often, or something.
[Reply]
Miwist,
You jest, but there are folks on here that seriously feel that way. Crazy world.
[Reply]
Why are people so trusting? We all live in the “it will never happen to me” dream world and it has to end. Not to sound like a commercial but my website http://www.crimshield.com allows someone to order their own background check and then share the results with others. Now if you have a questions about someone, you tell them to go get CrimShield Certified and then share the results with you. Why should I have to pay to figure out if I can trust someone? Let them pay to prove they are a good person and then share it with me.
[Reply]
Once again, MOMS, STOP LEAVING YOUR BABIES WITH YOUR BOYFRIENDS!!!
[Reply]
Background checks won’t do a damn bit of good until all these stoopid wimmen wake up and realize they DON’T NEED A MAYUNN.
[Reply]
This upsets me because this man did not have to be living there.. he was NOT the childs father… Why would you allow your dead-ass of a boyfriend to stay in your house when you KNOW he keeps a loaded gun and has refused to put it somewhere YOUR child can’t get to it? I swear I am sick to death of hearing about this little girls with babies who want to be dependent for a man in their life… I hope the mom feels like shit.. and I hope this guys gets life…
[Reply]
Fred- as usual, you are whack-a-crack. But, you do make me laugh. Yeah, some toddler who still shits in their pants is not likely to understand gun ediquette.
Miwist- your brand of humour is the kind that makes you read (and re-read) a couple of times. IMO, that’s pretty stellar.
Dr. Extreme- now all you need is some hottie to share your ‘gun-bashing’ dream with!
Saubrey- That sounds like a great idea. But, I’m jaded. I immediately thought of how many which-ways some criminal could tweak their own self-reporting to get a good profile.
Mememe- You are right. Lots of women need to wake up and realize that they do NOT need to have men in their lives if they consistently keep choosing abusive people. That said, children DO need men in their lives.
For the sake of argument, I am going to assume (incorrectly, I’d guess, by the stories on this site) that most women (girls?) use some form of birth control if they are willingly having sex. Every form of contraceptive (even sterilization.. tho the chances are miniscule) has the risk of pregnancy. It’s reassuring to think that you aren’t are the 3% of women who’ll get pregnant within a year using the pill, or the 10% of women that will get pregnant using condoms, or the what- 75% who will get pregnant using no BC at all.
Someone IS that percentage that gets pregnant. Most likely-you. So, it’s only smart that women stop thinking that BC is the end-all/be-all. Stop having sex- even protected sex- with people that you KNOW you would not want to have a child with. Masturbation is kinda fun, and it has the added bonus of not ever leading to having children that someone might abuse.
And, for the whacko crazy ‘babymomma wannabees’ out there…. you might as well start up an abortion account, cuz you getting pregnant is NOT going to make him love you, take care of you, or take care of your child. Chances are more likely that he- or your next fuck-buddy- will actually KILL your kid.
While women may not NEED men (or their lovely penises… ack, don’t get me started!)… ALL children benefit from having a great dad. Fathers are really underrated. And they are a lot more important to a child’s longterm wellbeing that most people give them credit for. Having a child with someone who is not good ‘daddy’ material is a losing proposition. Having a boyfriend (especially one who lives with you!) who has no intention of marrying you or adopting your child as his is even worse.
Once you’ve made the mistake of having a kid with someone who just wanted to fuck you, but didn’t want a kid, you need to change your focus from me, me, me, to my kid, my kid, my kid.
It is SOOO fucking annoying to keep trying to convince people that women are actually intelligent creatures when there’s so many ‘babymommas’ waiting in the wings to prove me wrong. Argghh.
How likely is it that this child shot themselves? None. Any kid who has physically advanced enough to have the dexterity to grasp a gun KNOWS that the object is to point it at another person. Which is why so many children are killed when a kid gets ahold of their POS parent’s gun.
Teenager shoots themselves? Possibly. Toddler shoots themselves? Um, do not pass GO, do not collect $200. A POS adult shot them.
c
[Reply]
Meaghan reply on March 19, 2008:
I’ve read that the chances of a woman becoming pregnant from a single act of unprotected sex is actually pretty small — like 1 in 12.
The way I look at unplanned illegitimate pregnancies (I know some women plan to have a baby out of wedlock and don’t count those) is this: one baby was a mistake. It happens. But TWO such unplanned children, or more, is the mommy being a dumbfuck, no pun intended.
[Reply]
RealityCheck reply on March 28, 2008:
1 in 12 is SMALL? Are you aware of how many girls and women there are in the world?
That is fucking huge and the reason for abused and dead children.
[Reply]
Meaghan reply on March 28, 2008:
1 in 12 is a small risk, numerically speaking, yes. But I would agree that the consequences of being that 1 are huge.
RealityCheck reply on March 28, 2008:
I’m guessing neither of you passed math 101!
Jason reply on March 28, 2008:
The odds are actually 1 in 3 for women under the age of 27.
I can’t find the source with the age, but this at least supports the 1 in 3 number.
http://www.avert.org/faqpreg.htm#q3aa
Regardless of the unprotected sex and pregnancy numbers there are efficient methods of birth control. Condom and BC pills, when used together and correctly are almost 100% effective in preventing pregnancy.
Millions of women and their husbands use this an other forms of layered birth control to insure they only get pregnant when they choose to get pregnant.
IUDs, Depo, and a host of other hormonal treatments are also extremely effective.
All that aside, perhaps the most effective method of preventing “unwanted” pregnancies is unceasing vigilance in your own personal responsibility. When you start a relationship, wait until both of you are ready to be monogamous, before engaging in sex. Make sure both of you have been tested for diseases since your last sexual partners. People merely interested in one-night stands do not normally provide documentation that they’re free of disease to their prospective sexual partners.
After you have the proof that both of you are responsible enough to protect one another from disease (1 in 4 women have something) it should be a simple matter to discuss birth control and further protection. If your partner and you both have successfully avoided all diseases, odds are, unless it’s the first time either of you are having sex, that protection has been used in the past.
If, after such a responsible process has still resulted in an “unwanted” pregnancy, you, as responsible adults should be able to discuss your options and choose adoption (my favorite choice and the one I wish was nearly 100% chosen in the case of an unwanted pregnancy), to raise the child but continue to explore your own relationship and perhaps those with other people if yours doesn’t work(shot gun weddings have a high failure rate), or if to consider termination(While I abhor it as an option, the right to choose this option for whatever reason other than sadism and/or insanity is and should be protected).
I find it very hard to believe than even 1% of unwanted pregnancies occur among adults who made responsible decisions.
[Reply]
I’m telling you, the Feds need to put out a blanket offer of $10,000 plus medical costs to pay for vasectomies and tubal ligations. Anyone who takes them up on the offer is either a) not wanting any (more) children; b) more concerned about how they’ll pay for their next rock of crack (in which case they don’t need to have children) or c) very shortsighted that they can’t see past the $10k to the day when they’ll want kids (in which case it’s probably better if they don’t anyway since they’re very likely to have them before they’re ready).
Also, crackheads and tweakers should not get a choice in the matter.
This plan will pay for itself tenfold in a generation, I guarantee it.
[Reply]
Dark Marcsun- absoeffinlutely. Pay up front for anyone wanting drugs that badly.
Hmmm… I don’t usually have a beef with the ACLU, but I’magonnaguess they’d feed into this topic at some point. They’ll say drug addicts have the right to be drug addicts.
I agree. But I don’t think children have the right to be born addicted. So, sue me.
Other than that, I think there should be the possibility of long-term birth control. I’m pretty sure it already exists, but the drug manufacturers don’t have a grip on it yet. Figure in enough profit for them, and there you go.
c
[Reply]
Meaghan reply on March 19, 2008:
There’s a birth control vaccine you can get that lasts, I think, five years.
[Reply]
Yeah, Meaghan… there’s also at least 3 new birth controls for men that have passed the drug trials. Problem seems to be that men just really won’t be profitable, since they rarely want to use any birth control themselves. From what I’ve read, there’s a long-term shot that eliminates sperm from any ejaculation, a pill on par with the standard women’s pill, and a patch. None are on the market because the drug companies can’t figure out how to market them and make money off it.
If I was a guy, I’d think I’d love to have a BC rx that allowed me to boff anyone I wanted to, anytime, without worry of knocking them up. No surprise preggie scares. But I’m not a guy, so go figure. Maybe guys prefer to stick with what they know, Like douching with pepsi and jumping up and down after having sex.
I rarely even try to comprehend what men think, since I don’t enjoy the brain-freeze that inevitably results from that effort.
c
[Reply]
chad teal reply on April 13, 2008:
this would of never happend if he would of put that gun up when the gf told him to. he knows that he did it on purpose. he deserves to burn in hell
[Reply]