This is 33-year-old Daniel Allen Everett.
Despite what his WWE t-shirt claims, Daniel Everett is not the “World’s Greatest Dad.” Really, it’s like they just let anyone buy those shirts now.
No, Daniel Everett is just another sexual predator with a yahoo account that was caught in the latest of a series of Internet sex stings conducted by the office of Michigan’s Attorney General.
Daniel Allen Everett was using the yahoo nickname “danmichelle2004” when he started chatting up what he thought was 14-year-old girl. If he’d only stuck with his claimed hobby of “spending more time with my family,” perhaps Daniel wouldn’t be in this mess.
Instead, Daniel Everett and the “girl” he thought was a dream come true had several extremely graphic sexual conversations over a period of time.
Eventually, Daniel became so comfortable with this “girl” that he decided that he wanted to meet the object of his infatuation and introduce her into the world of man/girl sex.
Sadly, on the 15th of July, 2008, when Daniel traveled to a nearby town to meet up with his beloved for their sexual tryst, he found the police waiting for him.
Attorney General Mike Cox took the opportunity to remind the voters how tough he is when he made this public statement:
Today’s arrest is a reminder that a parent can pose a threat to our children. And no matter how “great” a criminal thinks they are, if you intend to harm or solicit children, my office is coming after you.
Daniel Everett has been charged with one count of child sexually abusive activity and one count of using the Internet to commit child sexually abusive activity. Each of those charges can possibly result in 20-year prison sentences.
Daniel Allen Everett posted a $50,000 cash bond and was released, pending trial.
Loading ...Spread the word about this article!
Similar Posts:
40 possible years huh? Can’t we just cut off the offending limb? Seems to be a better and simpler solution to me.
[Reply]
Eh…this seems a little tame by pysih standards. I say we send him a sternly worded letter.
[Reply]
admin reply on July 16th, 2008:
I like a little variety in my evil. If you want more evil, write it yourself. We’ll post it if it’s good enough.
[Reply]
What a pig.
[Reply]
A possible 20-year prison sentence?
That sucks.
At least you could send him off to a glory-hole and make him think it’s his 14-year-old girlfriend on the other side of the wall, but in reality it’ll be Olga Rutterschmidt or Helen Golay. Send him prison after he gets his rocks off.
Olga Rutterschmidt and Helen Golay’s life sentence includes blowing cons and backdoor services.
[Reply]
Sherry reply on July 16th, 2008:
If I were a male (which I’m clearly not) I’d go for anything other than those two. ACK!
“I’ll take the horse-dog for $200. Alex!”
[Reply]
TurtleMania reply on July 17th, 2008:
True - he should’ve taken the horse-dog combo. But noooo.
You see, this is what dumb-asses do; they get married and then want to have extramarital affairs with teenage girls. If the idiot had jerked-off before he took his venture, he’d be at home right now.
Now he faces a possible forty-years for an imaginary friend, a “ghost” rather. Yes, and he didn’t even get to wet his willy, but forty-years for intent. That sucks big time. If I were him, I’d hang myself in prison if given the chance.
[Reply]
Whats sick is that this kind of thing just solicits a “ho-hum” attitude, rather than the outrage we should all have about it.
The only reason this guy got any exposure at all (no pun intended) was because of the irony of the TShirt he was wearing when he was busted.
I wonder how this perv - “Worlds Greatest Dad” that he is - would feel if some dirty, scummy, sleezbag old fart wanted to explore man/girl love with his own daughter? Sick freak!
[Reply]
He deserves it for being such a pervert and lust over a CHILD instead of his wife who he was ready to cheat on. Who said no, anyway? Idiots.
[Reply]
Damn, its Chuck Norris!
[Reply]
I don’t get it. I just read the post about Shakil Chowdhury who ACTUALLY raped a 12 year old, over and over again, and only got 6 years in prison. What Daniel did is wrong, yes, but he didn’t actually touch the girl and he may be getting 20-40 years? Something doesn’t add up.
But anyways- obviously this dude deserves hell for even thinking about doing such a thing. Sick bastard.
[Reply]
Fred reply on July 18th, 2008:
I read in a post that Shakil was smart enough to rape his girl in the UK while our great dad did hid thing in the USA where this type of stuff still outrages most of the people.
Moral of the stories - meet your internet dream girls in the UK
[Reply]
exactly Tress, that’s what I was saying just seemed…odd. The guy talks (or rather types) and gets a possible 40 years. Another rapes a girl 11 times, 6 of which he’ll admit and gets 6 years. That’s completely and totally fucked up. This guy I guess should have just found a girl, raped her and been “nice” about it and then bought her dinner and driven her home. I’m almost sick of this crap…shoot evil fucks for fucks sake and be done with it, or better yet, open gun laws, let me shoot an evil fuck legally when I see then fuck up!
[Reply]
You’d think “yay! They’ve stopped him before he hurt a kid.”
Just cause he got caught this time, that doesn’t mean that he hasn’t done this before and hasn’t sexed up a kid in the past. All though it is possible that this is going to stop him from committing this crime in the future, who says he hasn’t done it before.
Oh, and if I was going to meet some girl for the first time, regardless of age, hell would have to freeze over before I’d wear that shirt on a first date…come on?!?
[Reply]
Hell, anyone who loves the WWE should be shot anyway….why leave him out lol
[Reply]
here’s a headsup for all the people wondering WHY….different states have different laws governing child rape, child abuse, etc etc….jesus you’d think that coming up with idea was like inventing the fucking lightbulb!!! Do you truly need a picture book to figure that out?
Doesn’t make it right however. Unfortunately, the laws governing child abuse are wide ranging from state to state. It just might be useful to have a uniform law covering the land…but I guess not. Death to all these scumbags anyway!! No excuses!!
[Reply]
Kenny reply on July 18th, 2008:
well…apparently a lack in peoples (mine as well) reading skill makes everyones life a little harder. This clearly also shows the differences in country laws as well…this was in teh US, the rape was in teh UK…diffent strokes and all that, cheerio!
[Reply]
TurtleMania reply on July 18th, 2008:
Kenny gave you your lightbulb, An1mal.
You can turn it on now.
[Reply]
heh I take back ever wanting to kick your balls in turtle :)
[Reply]
this would be the first guy in line to beat the hell out of any dude, old or young, that would prop his own kids. yea! 40 or 20 is not enough but, in this case, its something.
“i’ll f#ck your daughter/son but don’t fuck mine!”
he is one in the long line of MANY that needs to get busted.
i hope the wife isn’t going to stay married to him. i HATE that… it sends the message that, “well, he made a mistake/was entrapped, so i am going to stand by my man, despite the creepiness and infidelity.” hey stand by some dignity! you deserve it. you were married to someone that enjoys ballet, er, i mean professional wrestling; you deserve better.
[Reply]
Anyone who has to wear a tshirt extolling their virtues already has a problem. Inferiority complex/narcissistic personality disorder anyone?
I never worry about entrapment because as a rule I don’t put myself in positions of doing things I wouldn’t normally do. Getting busted for entrapment is like having to pay for the other 49 times you did something evil and got away with it.
Unless there is threats or violence involved, I’m all for entrapment. Don’t want to be entrapped? Don’t effin try to set up things that are illegal or morally wrong. I have no sympathy for whiners who get caught before they do some sick thing they planned to do. Fry, baby, crybaby.
c
[Reply]
Mazzi reply on July 19th, 2008:
Amen GloryBug!
[Reply]
Umm, doesn’t anyone understand why entrapment is wrong? Entrapment is when the authorities create crime and arrest people for their own purposes. Like this guy gets to be a platform for public ridicule and everyone’s political agenda in an election year. There never was a child in this situation, but he’s being charged for attempting to harm a child. Who’s being protected? Where is the sanity or reality to this situation? Why not just go one step further and grab people off the street for “suspicion of attempting to possibly…” Up to 40 years? This is astounding. The police shouldn’t create crime and they shouldn’t encourage it.
[Reply]
Sherry reply on July 21st, 2008:
If they hadn’t done that, God forbid he started talking to your 14 year old daughter.
[Reply]
noone reply on July 21st, 2008:
I don’t have a daughter which is the point. There wasn’t anyones’ “daughter” in trouble. The police posed as a person that never existed. Putting people like this in jail is a waste of money and makes labeling others as a “sex offender” useless. Understand, he wasn’t going after a real 9 year old, but a non- existent 14 year old. One that was never at risk, because it didn’t exist. He is being prosecuted for a crime where there isn’t a victim. To me an imaginary or even a “possible victim” isn’t enough to waste the courts’ time. This is a huge issue, and really says something about this society where we prosecute people about actions that never happened towards victims that never existed.
Don’t think you yourself are immune to this. I see lots of people make the mistake thinking that they are good, righteous people. Have you ever considered that might not be the opinion of others? That maybe someone in a position of power might take advantage of you and think their actions to be righteous and without malicious intent?
Look the prosecutor for example, and the cops, and everyone in this comment section. People judge others in a mob to make themselves feel like good people, sometimes regardless if it is right and wrong. That seems to be the whole point of this website I’m finding. It acts as a drug to make people feel good by condemning others, no matter if they know these people personally or if they were directly effected by their actions. That’s why none of you care that the police made up “victim” here. That’s why you all call for his punishment and in some cases his death.
If you are so concerned about children, ask yourself what kind of warped reality and what kind of law you want future generations exposed to. The United States has the largest criminal population per capita in the world. That number will only climb as cases like this increase and it will become only more irrational in how people are prosecuted. I don’t need this man in jail to make me feel safe. What will make me feel safe is a justice system that doesn’t seek to merely make the mass public feel righteous and to fill the ever expanding prisons built one after the other in this nation. This is a loose cannon.
[Reply]
TurtleMania reply on July 21st, 2008:
Here’s my take on entrapment. The following script IS entrapment.
danmichelle2004: Hi Jailbait14
Jailbait14: Hi
Jailbait14: asl
danmichelle2004: 33/m/Mich.
danmichelle2004: and u?
Jailbait14: 14/f/usa
danmichelle2004: cool
Jailbait14: I like older guys, wanna fuck?
danmichelle2004: uh, sure.
THIS is NOT entrapment:
danmichelle2004: Hi Jailbait14
Jailbait14: Hi
Jailbait14: asl
danmichelle2004: 33/m/Mich.
danmichelle2004: and u?
Jailbait14: 14/f/usa
danmichelle2004: cool
danmichelle2004: do you like older guys?
Jailbait14: I’m not sure.
danmichelle2004: I like you. I wanna love you up and down.
danmichelle2004: let’s meet somewhere
_________________________________________
I don’t think it happened like the latter. That is why he got caught.
Any bonehead should know that doing something like this is WRONG.
Hasn’t he watched that undercover show where the guy videotapes these assholes as they come through the door expecting to see little miss muffin?
He should know by now that he’d get caught. The article doesn’t say how it went down. But I have a feeling he came on to “her” online.
[Reply]
noone reply on July 21st, 2008:
It doesn’t matter that he got caught doing this. It is a bad standard of law. Now he’s a statistic. Some politician is going to use him by saying “I’ve put away 3000 child sexual predators” in some campaign speech. It isn’t the same as he put away 2 people who actually raped children and then 2998 saps like this guy. I don’t care if it was on TV. This is about asking what a real crime is and what appropriate punishment according to the law is.
I knew a young lady in my town who worked as a bar tender. There was a man checking IDs at the door. At her bar, no one under 21 is allowed in. Everyone must have a valid ID. One night cops “in disguise” came in, and showed a valid state ID at the door. They walked to the bar and ordered a drink. When she served them, they arrested her in what they called sting operation, and charged her with serving alcohol to minor. This is nearly an identical circumstance. There never was a minor, procedure was followed, and she faces jail time and fines regardless. The cops should be going after people who actually commit crimes. I didn’t know they had so much free time they would encourage crime and snoop and troll around until they convinced or presented an opportunity to people to commit them.
They did this in New York. They left wallets on subway platforms and waited to for people to pick them up. When the people did, they were charged with stealing. Cops shouldn’t be committing these acts. They themselves are an affront to basic freedoms and sound law (not that I believe that is possible, considering)
People are making a mistake here. This guy in the article is guilty of this too. The mistake is, the internet isn’t real and people shouldn’t try to let it seep into their reality. That’s why we have such sub-standards for reality today. We tolerate so-called “crimes” like this to happen. This is a virtual crime. A simulacra of a crime. That isn’t crime. It isn’t reality. It is entrapment.
[Reply]
TurtleMania reply on July 21st, 2008:
I understand what you’re saying. IMO, IF he came on to “her”, he is guilty as charged.
If the officers did some underhanded, slick willy thing, they should release him.
That’s how I see it.
Silly of Dan to attempt this knowing they broadcasted that predator show many, many times. He doesn’t live under a rock. He knows about WWE, come on.
What made him think he’d never get caught solicting someone underage? Don’t forget they do have online chat laws that say these sorts of things are illegal.
No one is exempt.
Entrapment is against the law. If the boys in blue want us to abide by the law then they must do the same thing. But like I said, this was not entrapment because more than likely, he came on to “her”.
JMHO
Mazzi reply on July 21st, 2008:
Entrapment in general is wrong, however there is a legal principle that requires that a “substantive” part of a crime be committed before a person can be charged with the crime.
In the case of child molestors, using this principle would mean that in order to arrest a predator, they would have to catch him at the time he made physical contact with the child. This is impossible to set up, because it would put real live children at risk, obviously. And waiting until AFTER he has molested means that the child is irreverably harmed.
I think in these types of cases, it is a lesser of two evils. The fact that this man took the steps to meet with what he THOUGHT was a young girl, means that he would have done the same had it been an actual girl. That is evidence of an intended crime.
Now, it really comes down to the evidence in each case. The communications should be evaluated to see if HE initiated the meeting or the sex talk, or if the decoy did. If the decoy did, then he is still a child molester, but it is unfair to prosecute him. If he initiated it, then there is no question, and he should be off the streets ASAP - before he can get ahold of a real 14 year old.
Believe me, I am aware of the chipping away of our rights, and I am as worried about it as anyone. I actually scream at the TV when I hear some of the stupidity that we allow to happen every day - taking more and more of our freedom from us. BUT - I am even more angry at people who harm the vulnerable in our society, the children, the elderly and the disabled. When these victims are involved, I say all holds barred. Get them off the streets now, ny any means necessary. The potential victims matter much more than the criminal’s rights.
Mazzi reply on July 21st, 2008:
oops, I meant NO holds barred! And “ny any means” should be “BY any means”.
An edit feature would really rock this site, lol.
There has been quite a few shows out there like that, but probably the first and most infamous one was the dateline special. I believe that’s the one you mean.
http://www.perverted-justice.com/
Great site. I encourage everyone who is a fan of this site, check out the PJs
[Reply]
noone reply on July 21st, 2008:
That organization has an incredibly ironic name. That dateline series is getting sued to extinction now. Crime shouldn’t be entertainment. Where there is a profit to be made, there must be a constant source. Creating crime for kicks is a horrible thing.
[Reply]
I completely disagree, and if anything it helped raised awareness in many households of the danger these sickos pose.
[Reply]
Do you guys not understand this?
There were online rules and regulations that he was bound to.
When he opened an account he had to click “I Agree”/”I Accept” thus binding him to the code of conduct between a minor and an adult. Do you understand?
No matter if it wasn’t a real 14 year old. That’s not important. They have said many times they would crackdown and increase online laws to protect children. Every medium from Google to Microsoft have increased their stances against harm to minors online. He get’s another ten years for not reading the Yahoo agreement.
Don’t freaking make me post that agreement here. I will if I have to so you can see line-by-line.
[Reply]
TurtleMania reply on July 21st, 2008:
Yahoo MEMBER CONDUCT
You understand that all information, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages, tags, or other materials (”Content”), whether publicly posted or privately transmitted, are the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. This means that you, and not Yahoo!, are entirely responsible for all Content that you upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available via the Service. Yahoo! does not control the Content posted via the Service and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such Content. You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable. Under no circumstances will Yahoo! be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any Content, or any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted, emailed, transmitted or otherwise made available via the Service.
You agree to not use the Service to:
b) harm minors in any way;
k) intentionally or unintentionally violate any applicable local, state, national or international law.
These are painfully obvious. However there could be more…
[Reply]
You’re preaching to the choir here man. I have no problem with the way he was taken down… and would like to see more of it.
[Reply]
But they aren’t protecting children. They are enticing people to have sex with children by posing as children. Why isn’t that treated with the same level of disgust? I find it really unnerving. I’d rather they didn’t set up sting operations or stage entrapment. I’d rather they catch and prosecute actual criminals. As in, “people who have committed a crime” not “people who were given an opportunity to commit a crime wherein those individuals may or may not have done so if the false opportunity was presented, etc, etc.”
I don’t support punishing crime based on a possible alternate reality. I don’t believe that if there wasn’t a cop there in the place of the 14 year old, it would have been the most innocent dearest girl YOU know. The reality still stands, there was no girl. Reality is paramount here. There was no girl! No Victim. No child. No crime!
[Reply]
Mazzi reply on July 22nd, 2008:
OK that is a SICK statement! “They are enticing people to have sex with children by posing as children”. How can a non-pervert be ENTICED to have sex with children? Could you? I sure as hell could not be ENTICED to have sex with a child, under any circumstances.
What you are basically saying is - let the perverts do whatever they want to the kids, then we will come in afterwards, arrest and punish them. Hello? Are you serious?
Certainly if the sick fuck DOES hurt a kid, they need to be punished, but if we can PREVENT it, that is 1000% better. The perv is in jail, and at least SOME kids are safe.
And if we have to give up one more sliver of our personal freedom for the sake of the innocent children, then I am willing.
[Reply]
Ummm I don’t follow your reasoning because obviously you have not the slightest clue!! If you had been to the PJ site, you would have known better…
“Information Sharing Agreements
As you may have seen on our multiple Dateline NBC broadcasts, we work exclusively with police. We have several hundred information-sharing agreements with agencies from local police to the Department of Homeland Security – and you’re more than welcome to join forces with us as well. We essentially strive to serve as a tool for you to use; not every department will have the manpower or the hours to actually go out into the chat rooms, and we fill that role for you and provide incontrovertible documentation of what we do. We’ve established a solid evidence chain using our tried and true protocols and our innovative, in-house created software. Our volunteers work irregular hours (and in some cases, hours that detectives cannot work) and are trained exclusively on how to make solid, easily prosecutable cases that are guaranteed to put internet predators in jail – and we provide this service for free.”
So again i respectfully request you research your argument before you post on here looking like a dummy.
[Reply]
damn, somehow I ended up with 2 distinct names on here lol…all the same an1mal.
Again turtle, I hope you are not aiming that shit at me, because frankly any fucking moron can read a TOS statement before they agree to sign up…if they dont…well mongoloids all!
[Reply]
mazzi, right on brother!
[Reply]
Mazzi reply on July 22nd, 2008:
<>
[Reply]
Mazzi reply on July 22nd, 2008:
errrrrrrrr… guess the brackets stole my text, lol!
I said:
(( psssssssst, An1mal - that’s “sister” hee hee ))
[Reply]
Ok. Public officials want to track down released sex offenders with a GPS. Hmm. I think they’re on to something.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080723/ap_on_re_us/tracking_sex_offenders
[Reply]
boredboy14: sup glori?
GloryBug: Not much, you?
boredboy14: like kids?
GloryBug: As a matter of fact, I do. I have 2 boys of my own.
boredboy14: oh i lik milf
GloryBug: Milk? Ick. We’re vegan here.
boredboy14: no milf
GloryBug: And you’re 14?
boredboy14: ya
GloryBug: What do you think your mother will say when I report you to the board for TOS violations? This is an adult vegetarian board and you are not allowed on here. Scram, pipsqueak!
boredboy14: JK
—–
I would imagine any intelligent non-molestor adult could handle this just the same, whether the hypothetical boredboy14 was really 14 or an undercover cop or a 15 year old girl. It’s not really that hard to NOT do illegal abusive, molesty kinds of things when the topic doesn’t interest you, and pretty easy not to even talk/IM about them when they disgust you.
Some people protest a bit too much, eh? Especially when it involves molesty things for some reason. Go figure. lol.
c
[Reply]
AMEN Glory!!!
[Reply]
GPS is a great idea, but Id go one further.
Anyone ever see the arnie movie “The Running Man”? In the begining, at the prison, all the cons had explosive collars on.
it shouldn’t be hard to make a real one and have it set to blow off the pedos head if he ever goes near a school, playground, etc etc..
[Reply]
UPDATE!
PONTIAC, Mich. — A 33-year-old Clarkston man who authorities said wore a “World’s Greatest Dad” T-shirt to have sex with someone he believed was a 14-year-old girl has pleaded guilty to sex-abuse charges.
http://www.wnem.com/news/17129224/detail.html
[Reply]
TurtleMania reply on August 9th, 2008:
This is good to know.
[Reply]
Max The Cat reply on August 9th, 2008:
Well I guess he won’t be able to wear that shirt any more, will he Animal?
It’s pretty funny haw these guys will protest their innocence over & over again ad nauseum. That is until some prosecutor tells shows the evidence and tells them the difference between the the sentence if he pleads guilty and the sentence if he’s FOUND guilty. Assholes like Dan hurry up and find Jesus pretty quick after that.
Max
[Reply]
An1mal reply on August 9th, 2008:
Im only sorry my chosen home state doesn’t have the DP….one would think, how progressive michigan always has been….motor city….motown…the red wings…GO WINGS!!!!….they would also have the DP….unfortunately no….
Sure he could still wear that T-shirt…although in prison he won’t be the “greatest dad”…that is reserved for Bubba!!!
[Reply]
TurtleMania reply on August 9th, 2008:
Wait! Dude are you in Detroit?
I got to say the Mayor there is an asshole!
I want him GONE. He needs to step his ass down, really.
I am so tired of seeing his dumb pathetic face on my news blogs.
Max, T-shell aka turtle hehe….
Ive been having trouble updating my radovan story…..was trying to post an update as I did here…no joy. Do me a favor and post something in that thread…just to see if everyone hated my story…or its just a site bloop!
[Reply]
Detroit…never lived there…thank god!
Mayor McCheese there SHOULD step down…..just another politican who makes his living with lies…
[Reply]