People You’ll See In Hell

Get updates by e-mail. Free!
Why subscribe?

  • More information on why subscribing to an online background check service is a good idea:



  • Shakil Chowdhury

    Shakil ChowdhuryOn the 27th of October in 2006, 39-year-old Shakil Chowdhury was driving around in his car, looking for something to do.

    Well, he found it.

    The girl was 12. She was lost, and was looking for directions back to her part of town. She made the mistake of asking Shakil Chowdhury for help.

    Shakil Chowdhury was able to lure the 12-year-old into his car with promises that he would help her find her home. Once she got into the car, she told Shakil her name, her address and her age. Shakil told the girl that he could probably find her house, but said that he had to go to his house for something first. He asked her if she would like to go with him and, of course, the girl agreed to go.

    Shakil Chowdhury drove the girl two blocks to his home, where he gave her some alcohol and told her to go lie down on a bed in an upstairs bedroom.

    A few minutes after she stretched out on the bed, Shakil showed up, held her down and raped her. Once he finished, Shakil Chowdhury left.

    Moments later, a friend of his came into the room to take his turn at raping the girl.

    While Shakil’s friend was raping his houseguest, Shakil was calling up some friends and inviting them to come over and have some fun too. Two more men showed up at Shakil Chowdhury’s house and raped the girl, between rapings that Shakil performed as the day wore on.

    Shakil raped the 12-year-old a total of 11 times, moving the girl from bed to bed in his home and forcing her to clean herself between rapings.

    Spent and tired, Shakil Chowdhury decided that he and his friends had enjoyed themselves enough and finally drove the girl home.

    When he dropped her off at her parents’ house, Shakil asked her for her phone number before he drove off.

    Once at home, the girl told her parents what she had gone through and the police were called. The pre-teen was able to remember the address of her rapist’s home, which led to a nice little raid and the arrest of Shakil Chowdhury.

    Shakil Chowdhury pled guilty to six counts of rape and threw himself on the mercy of the court - who actually turned out to be fairly merciful to a kidnapper rapist.

    In what seems like just another kind of rape, the state sentenced Shakil Chowdhury to a mere six years in prison.

    Detective Chief Inspector Mary Doyle was quick to point out the obvious, to commend the girl for her bravery and to praise the system:

    Chowdhury’s actions that evening would have been unacceptable on a woman of any age, but to carry out this sort of attack on a 12-year-old child is simply abhorrent. His victim has shown a great deal of bravery throughout this case. I hope her bravery and the resulting conviction will encourage other victims to come forward, safe in the knowledge that Greater Manchester Police will investigate any complaints fully and take robust action against the people responsible.

    Authorities haven’t yet found the other three men, but you can be assured robust action will be taken against them when they turn themselves in sometime soon.

    Does Shakil Chowdhury deserve Hell?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Spread the word about this article!

    Del.icio.usDiggRedditStumbleUpon

    Similar Posts:


    60 Responses to “Shakil Chowdhury”

    1. comment number 1 by: Sherry

      Fucking piece of shit.

      [Reply]

    2. comment number 2 by: Steve

      The judge in this case also deserves hell!

      [Reply]

      Sherry reply on July 17th, 2008:

      Yeah, where’s that option?

      [Reply]

      SlimPickins reply on July 17th, 2008:

      Right under where we get to vote for you cretons.

      [Reply]

    3. comment number 3 by: Anna

      How in God’s name can he only get 6 years??? I hope they let the other inmates know what he did and take their own turns with him….

      I hate our legal system.

      [Reply]

      Sherry reply on July 17th, 2008:

      Doesn’t it make you feel awesome to be called an American knowing that people like this get away with repeatedly raping a 12 year old girl?

      admin - This was in the U.K.

      [Reply]

      Meaghan reply on July 18th, 2008:

      That explains a lot. British prison sentences tend to be much shorter than American ones.

      [Reply]

      Trace reply on July 22nd, 2008:

      I was going to say.. “Manchester”

      [Reply]

    4. comment number 4 by: Kenny

      Something sounds just…off about the whole thing. I don’t mean just the events, I mean…I guess he figured if all he did was rape her lots of time instead of rape and kill he’d get off with a slap on the wrist, and if he’s gonna rape her, might as well do it a lot…I mean, 6 years is an insult. 6 years per count would be better…at a minimum, at least then it would be 36 years, but 1 year per count, just seems odd. Plus the girl never even tried to run?

      [Reply]

      SiotehCat reply on July 18th, 2008:

      I agree that something seems off. How did the girl get lost? She can memorize her own address and the address of her rapist, but she thought drinking beer and going up to his bed was a good idea? I’m not blaming the victim here, but something does seem off.

      [Reply]

    5. comment number 5 by: Cass

      Him and his friends deserve hell.

      He should’ve got life.

      [Reply]

    6. comment number 6 by: TurtleMania

      Problem: I want to penetrate something small and compact.

      Solution: Go to realdolldotcom, shell out the cash and get you a 5 footer doll. You can pound it, stab it, punch it, and kick it, without risking your freedom. :)

      Cheers

      [Reply]

      Sherry reply on July 17th, 2008:

      I always wanted one of those! They have replacable penis’!

      Too bad for Shuck Cowdurty… er whatever his name is.

      [Reply]

    7. comment number 7 by: Tress

      Totally sick. Seemed like a huge game to him. I really don’t understand why the girl would go and lay in the bed in the first place, or why she didn’t try to run, but I’m not blamming her at all. She was probably terrified because she was lost in the first place, and probably thought that this guy was her hero. What a piece of shit. And 6 years??? You’ve got to be f-ing kidding me. I hope he doesnt make it out alive. Can’t wait until they catch his friends, too.

      [Reply]

    8. comment number 8 by: Mazzi

      OK - first of all, a rape victim is not required to try to escape or even to resist. Period. The courts have been very clear on this. So long as she feels that she is in danger, the court is NOT allowed to assess HER state of mind or her action or lack of action.

      Second, even if the 12 year old was a “Lolita” (to put it nicely) this certainly must have been, at the least, statutory rape. I am not familiar with TX law, but I am pretty sure that EVERY state would consider sex between a 12 year old and an adult as statutory. I seem to recall that the youngest age now (in the past year anyway) is 14. 12 year olds do not have the legal capacity to “consent” to sex.

      So, how the FUCK did he just get 6 years? There is something terribly wrong here. Horribly wrong. In my state, an adult having “non-forced” sex with a child would be anywhere from 20 years to life. Add the violence factor and it could be mandatory life w/o parole.

      This makes me sick. I want the judge hanging by his balls too, and a whole bunch of 12 year old girls standing under him, pretending it’s a pinata party.

      [Reply]

      Mazzi reply on July 17th, 2008:

      Wow! OK I really hosed that one up.

      I was so mad, blood was coming out of my eyes, I guess. Anyway, it was not in Texas. It was not even in the US. It was in the UK.

      The UK seems to have the absolute weakest sentencing guidelines for child rapists of any developed nation.

      BOOOOOOOOOOOOO to the UK… you suck worse than we do!

      [Reply]

      Meaghan reply on July 18th, 2008:

      The age of consent in the UK is sixteen.

      [Reply]

    9. comment number 9 by: Max The Cat

      Six years? Six Fucking Years!! For this baby raping sack of shit?! But the Supreme Court say Louisiana can’t execute repeat child molestors. And a rapers of 12 year old serve 3 out of their 6 year bid. This shit is wrong on so many levels. We need to seperate people like this from the rest of us, to protect our children from cocksucking predators who walk the earth hunting for the most helpless of victims. Cuz I swear, if this girl was my daughter, there’s no one and nothing in this world that could stop me from finding Shakil Chowdhury and his friends and blowing their heads clean off their shoulders. Fuckem

      Max

      [Reply]

      TurtleMania reply on July 17th, 2008:

      Yep, Max. In 6 years he’ll be walking around England looking for another 12 year old girl to fuck. Right now in prison he’s probably enjoying tea and crumpets, plotting his next move.

      If that girl gets pregnant, who’s the baby daddy? Sad.

      Oh and which one of them had HIV, gono, herpes, crabs, etc?

      New meaning to: “It ain’t no fun, if your homies can’t have none.”

      [Reply]

      Kenny reply on July 18th, 2008:

      he’s not a cocksucker…if that was the case, he might have only gotten 1 year for sucking some 12 year old boy off :P

      [Reply]

    10. comment number 10 by: Brittany

      6 years is half the childs age and thats all he’ll have to pay for this.

      she has the rest of her life to remember that night.

      [Reply]

    11. comment number 11 by: Lizzy

      I just have no words…Boooooooo!

      [Reply]

    12. comment number 12 by: An1mal

      Not only should this piece of shit be castrated, but also the judge AND especially the fucks who voted no for hell.

      Again and again we are confronted with these fucksticks who aren’t worth the flesh they are made of. And yet they vote no, and no again…..PLEASE admins…release the results of the voting….at the very least i want to confront these waste of sperm and ask them WTF IS YOUR PROBLEM? These fucks continue to vote no….WHY? Are you fucking retarded? Just a sloth look-alike just clicking buttons? Or are you fucks truly evil…the kind of “people” who can condone anything? The kind of waste that makes excuses for everything? I submit to all that these “people” deserve the exact same punishment as the true preps.

      Indeed, since this lovely site continues to publish confidential info about the perps, why not do the same to those who support them by voting no. These people are no different than the perps themselves….id love to debate at these simple fucks and ask them the obvious….what if it was your child? And if then, any of these fucks still says no….shove them all against the wall and….point, aim, pull….BOOM!!!

      [Reply]

    13. comment number 13 by: TurtleMania

      Just wondering…
      Was this girl too naive or did she have a physical or mental handicap?

      Just curious. No way if I saw this shitbag I’d get in his car.

      [Reply]

    14. comment number 14 by: Fred

      I hate the way our legal system admires Europe and esp the UK. We, the USA, are becoming more like them every day.
      Anyone who says a pedophile is just a sick person is part of the problem. A pedophile is a criminal period.
      People who believe pedophiles are just sick make me sick because they are such FUCKING BLEEDING HEART SHIT EATING ASSHOLES - my sickness touret’s syndrome

      [Reply]

    15. comment number 15 by: Darkest Maiden

      A man like that will not care if he’s young or not. They will do anything to impress their friends rather than women, infact abuse them, tells you what macho types are actaully like. They’d really prefer fucking their friends because they seem to care so much to impress them. A child being raped is BAD enough but the act is fucking insanely evil nevertheless, be it to a woman. He should have gotten life in jail with a fucking huge gay man cell-sharing. Same for his friends. :@

      [Reply]

      Fred reply on July 18th, 2008:

      His name and appearance seem to hint that he is Muslim or has Muslim in his family tree.
      In many Muslim countries women are second class citizens, it looks like he carries that attitude into the UK.
      It is bad enough that he raped her, but by inviting his friends, he downgraded his victim to an object. His friends also must share the same view - they shared his prey.
      This should be regarded as a hate crime as I am sure all his friends share the same ethnic background.

      [Reply]

      Meaghan reply on July 18th, 2008:

      Please do not say that. This had nothing to do with Mr. Chowdhury being a Muslim (if he was a Muslim), and everything to do with him being a piece of shit. It is against the Muslim religion to rape, or to have sex outside of marriage — any decent Muslim would be horrified by his actions. Any decent person, period, would be. Religion doesn’t come in it at all.

      [Reply]

      Mulch reply on July 23rd, 2008:

      Screw the PC bullshit of hate crime. It was a crime and he is a snot rag.

      [Reply]

    16. comment number 16 by: TurtleMania

      Fred,

      His friends are gonna say:

      “I thought she was his friend.”
      “I thought she was of age.”
      “He said it was ok.”

      You know, this would hurt to the core it were my little girl. Man, I’d be so devestated right now. But on the flip-side I’d be glad he got six years because in six years I’d be waiting for him.

      [Reply]

      Fred reply on July 18th, 2008:

      But the UK’s system is so fucked up that somehow you’d be charged with a hate crime.
      His friends are not men; they are not owning up to what they did.
      I think each perp shoud get 6 years and I think that this scum bag should do 6 years for each friend he does not name!

      I think that they should put a big hole in a wall at the prison near the toilets. Hi’d be on the other side and only his ass would be in he hole. That way the prisoners could take a leak and then fuck him up the ass - a perfect trip to the men’s room there!

      [Reply]

    17. comment number 17 by: maritaK

      sandmonkey go back to yor country and play with yor camel’s balls u beat yor women cuz you hava pussy in between your legs too!

      [Reply]

      Max The Cat reply on July 18th, 2008:

      Another rednecked genius….Yeah man, let’s chase all the minorities out of the country so we can leave it’s fate to the likes of assholes like you. This country of immigrants, that is.
      Personally, I’m all for kicking every amoral asshole, like Shakey the baby raper, out of sight of the rest of the decent people in this country, but unfortunately for you Marita, you’d find yourself landing right beside him.

      Max

      [Reply]

      maritaK reply on July 24th, 2008:

      youre muslim too! this guys should go back to his country with his camels balls and play with his goat and sheep heis not wanted in a decent country
      you defended him cos you wear a turban like that sandmonkey! and I DONT CARE

      [Reply]

      ewww reply on September 13th, 2008:

      Haaaa, Marita, come on now, you’re showing quite the unhealthy interest in camel balls, goat fucking and woman-hating. This isn’t the first racist comment I’ve seen from you. I’m thinking just MAYBE you’ve got some issues. Oh, is my sandmonkey turban showing? Troll.

    18. comment number 18 by: An1mal

      lol too bad the sick fucks like shakill couldnt turn their lust towards rascist shitheels like marita….think of what a better world it truly would be!

      [Reply]

    19. comment number 19 by: kpoppy

      oh, she was so brave, so, in light of that, we’ll make her feel like there is no justice in the world and give this guy a mere tap on the shoulder. god forbid the uk slap his disgusting face with the law or morals.
      and, would it matter if she was just looking for trouble, mentally deficient, or just lost? y’all some crazy, lonely bastards looking for attention that think that being FORCED into sex with not just one but multiple partners is ok as long as she is whacked.
      if he is muslim, which, btw, he could be just another uk indian (and muslim, but maybe not), if he is muslim, then this girl’s family can by code kill someone, anyone, in his family, as well as her, and any of the dudes invited for a piece.
      i hope they take that up.
      this girl was brave. how do you endure that and be willing to tell someone and then know that there is no justice?
      uk justice is beyond worse than america, where we consdier it our right to drive our cars and water board anyone that seems “off”.
      shame on the uk… especially about the “she’s so brave”… yeah, she was brave considering that this guy is out to do the same thing before she can legally drive. SHAME!

      [Reply]

    20. comment number 20 by: ceecee

      what the hell kind of crazy person are we dealing with that he asks for her number after he kidnaps and rapes the girl? As if they met on the street and he want to take her out sometime. sicko

      [Reply]

      Meaghan reply on July 19th, 2008:

      There’s a specific kind of rapist, I forget the name of it, who tries to pretend his victim is a willing partner. He’ll talk to her like they’re on a date, compliment her, ask for her contact info, etc.

      [Reply]

    21. comment number 21 by: GloryBug

      “u beat yor women cuz you hava pussy in between your legs too!”

      Gotta love the irony of a woman insulting a man by implying he’s like a woman. I’ve also got a pussy between my legs, and have yet to feel the need to rape little girls.

      It’s insulting to the girl to commend her for her bravery and then to sentence her perp to only 6 years for kidnapping, raping, and then inviting 3 of his friends to do the same. No separate charge for the kidnapping?

      I don’t know UK law- is it like the US where he’ll get out in 3 years for being a good little boy?

      I don’t know if the perp was Muslim, but it’s possible. My point being that it wasn’t racist for people to assume his friends might have been also. People with similar backgrounds tend to hang together. In this case, it’s obvious that rapists hang around together too.

      c

      [Reply]

    22. comment number 22 by: Mazzi

      The name Chowdhury is much more likely to be Hindu or Urdu than Muslim. It basically means “landowner”, which is not unusual since the poor people (non land-owners) in India never have a chance to get out and move to the UK.

      Hopefully his next piece of land will be a really hot little corner of hell.

      [Reply]

    23. comment number 23 by: oupioneer

      this dude’s ass is going to be prime real estate in prison.

      [Reply]

    24. comment number 24 by: Fred

      The bottom line is that he and his friends come from a culture where women and toilets are about equal; with the difference being that if a man beat a toilet he’d be thought of as crazy and dangerious.
      Animals share their prey with each other to survive in communities, they do not share prey only to watch it suffer.
      It does not matter that name of his God, for he’ll end up in the same place that all “gods” put their trash!

      [Reply]

    25. comment number 25 by: marcie

      what a piece of shit that guy is…

      ive taught my daughter to not go with strangers…why havent her parents done that?

      the judge deserves hell 2

      [Reply]

      Mulch reply on July 24th, 2008:

      You mean…? No flippin way….You taught yer kid to THINK?!?!?!?! How could you? You are a non PC parent! Your sould will burn along with the planet in the new global warming hell!

      [Reply]

    26. comment number 26 by: janesmith

      This is a horrific story. I feel so much sorrow for the extensive physical, emotional, psychological, even spiritual damage inflicted on this precious little girl. Severe damage she will likely live with for the rest of her life.

      What I would like to know is where were her parents and why was she allowed to walk around ‘lost’ and ‘looking for directions back to her part of town’?

      If it was my baby girl, there is no way in hell I would allow her to traipse far from home. And I am most definitely NOT blaming the parents for the despicable crime committed against their little girl, but I wonder how any parent would be clueless as to the whereabouts of their child.

      Thanks greatly to the advent of the computer age, more and more of these sick predators are being exposed to general public. Ignorance is not bliss. Being well informed of the possible bodily harm that can be perpetrated against anyone, anywhere at anytime, especially children and women, is a self preservation must do!

      Personality Disordered Individuals walk amongst us conscience driven folks daily, searching for vulnerable, easy prey. Sometimes they use the cloak of kindness to seduce their victims, sometimes they are as obvious as the evil, sick predator in the article.

      Information, education regarding Predators and their predictable behaviors/actions, their manipulation techniques, their control oriented maneuvers designed to temporarily satisfy their sick selfish desires, is absolutely essential for staying alert and safe.

      [Reply]

      Mazzi reply on July 23rd, 2008:

      janesmith, you are too forgiving.

      I blame the parents. Not as much as I blame the sick perverts, but 12 year old girls are the responsibility of their parents. Parents should know where the kid is at all times, and that should be a SAFE place, with responsible people. Not wandering the streets.

      So yeah, the parents have a fair amount of blame here. Something tells me that they are probably pretty crappy parents anyway. If my 12 year old daughter was gone long enough to be raped 11 times, she would have come home to helicopters and search dogs, because I would have called the cops as soon as she was missing.

      Call me judgemental, but I think that parents that DON’T know where their kids are are sucky parents.

      [Reply]

    27. comment number 27 by: janesmith

      Yes, Mazzi, you are correct. The parents are the ones to be held accountable for not protecting their little girl from the very realistic dangers in the world.

      You stated it very succinctly and I agree.

      So very sad that this heartbreaking, yet fury inducing crime was committed upon this little girl and that it may have been avoided if the parents were more concerned, protective with her.

      And I don’t consider your comments to be judgmental at all. There are many times in our lives where being judging, cautiously discerning keeps us alive and breathing.

      [Reply]

      Mulch reply on July 24th, 2008:

      WHAT?!?!?!?!?!!? What in the hell did this girl or her parents do wrong?????

      Please pull yer head out of yer fourth point of contact and learn how to think!

      Why is it wrong for parents to want to allow their children to go outside. I’m willing to bet yer one “lady” that runs around sayingt hat kids are too fat and lazy.

      Next you’ll say that it was the kids fault.

      [Reply]

      Mazzi reply on July 24th, 2008:

      Is that supposed to be sarcastic humor? If so - FAIL! Epic fail! Totally wasn’t funny.

      The point of sarcastic humor is to say something very shockingly stupid, and then to temper it so that it is obvious that you are not serious.

      If you are serious, then you are a moron. Just in case, the point here is that 12 year old girls should not be alone, across town, in places they don’t know, with no supervision. 12 year old girls can be outside playing, but in their own yard or park, with a friend or two, and with someone responsible keeping track of them.

      And no, no matter how “grown” this girl thought she was - even if she was promiscious, it was not her “fault”. She may have not protected herself as well as she should, but children have no legal responsibilities, therefore they have no legal obligations. So, even if she had begged this guy to take her to his house and screw her (not saiying she did - just IF), she would not be to blame.

      Men have to take responsibility to know who they are screwing. There may be some 12 year olds who look more ilke 16, but I have yet to see one who looks 35. So, if the girl looks 16 or even 18, the man better be DAMNED sure she is of legal age no matter what she says.

      And, all that goes out the window in this case, because this CHILD was raped repeatedly by him and his band of goons. No female deserves that, even if she were a 30 year old prostitute.

      Back to the humor lesson, here are is a way that you could have said it, that might have been seen as sarcastic humor:

      “I don’t think it’s the parent’s fault at all - they just dropped her off across town so she could get some exercise, so she didn’t get fat and lazy. The silly girl had to go and hitch a ride. Those poor parents tried everything, but sadly, their efforts were in vain. The girl is just destined to be a couch potato.”

      Note: It’s still not FUNNY, but at least most people can see the sarcasm there.

      [Reply]

    28. comment number 28 by: Mick

      Castrate, then execute all of them.

      [Reply]

    29. comment number 29 by: RealityCheck

      I agree with Fred in that he should get 6 years for every friend he does not name. It is, after all his fault they had the opportunity to commit their crimes. In no way should it lessen their sentences, if given.
      Why no kidnapping charges? Luring under false pretense? Why are the parents not bringing these charges? I am not familiar with the laws of the UK, as you can tell.
      I’ll brush up.
      Something does sound a bit off.
      Can’t they get a sketch artist for the other three? Or investigate just a little to find out who his best friends are? Neighbors? Family? Other young girls in the area?
      Guess it’s just another party gone awry, at the expense of a twelve year-old party favor.

      [Reply]

      RealityCheck reply on July 28th, 2008:

      They never found Jack the Ripper either. What makes me think they can get their hands on some friends of a child molester?

      [Reply]

      Mazzi reply on July 28th, 2008:

      There were no cell phones, IM’s, emails, or DNA back then. Hell, they didn’t even have fingerprint technology. And, by most accounts - Jack was probably an extremely intelligent man.

      THIS perv sounds like a total moron, who probably left a trail as wide as the grand canyon. If they haven’t caught his pals yet, it’s because no one is really trying.

      Something is a bit “off” here, so I am thinking hell for a lot of people besides the perps - we just don’t know who they are.

      [Reply]

      An1mal reply on August 9th, 2008:

      Im not even sure how you could even begin to compare this case to good ol’ jack….apples and gd aircraft carriers there…lol

    30. comment number 30 by: InSerenity

      As I am voting on this stories, how in the hell you can read something like that and people say NO that they do not deserve to goto Hell! Is my computer saying something different than these people?

      This is in no way the victims nor the parents fault. Kids get lost, people are sick. It is the abusers and the abusers fault alone!

      [Reply]

    31. comment number 31 by: Kiefer

      SIX YEARS!?!?! What the fuck? They should kill the fucker! The justice system sucks balls!

      [Reply]

      An1mal reply on August 9th, 2008:

      you are preaching to the choir Mr sutherland :)

      [Reply]

    32. comment number 32 by: An1mal

      Btw…is it just me or does this guy look like a precursor to one of those new guinea shrunk head thingy?

      [Reply]

    33. comment number 33 by: Amy

      This makes me angry on so many levels. A grown man can rape a woman here in Western Australia and be sentenced 8yrs jail, and he only has to commit the act once.
      But a little girl in the UK can be raped 11+ times by this sick fuck and his sick fuck cronies and he only gets 6 FUCKING YEARS!
      When you say something is seriously amiss…you are making a GROSS understatement.

      [Reply]

    Join the Discussion - Leave a Reply:

    Name

    Mail (never published)

    Website