Comments on: Andrew Castor http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/ Your daily dose of evil Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:00:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: tiger http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-79050 tiger Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:15:13 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-79050 Sorry, one more thing. You said in your response to me that you're not so interested in who turtle was 15 years ago, it's the man he is today that counts for you. Okay....so if someone molested a child 15 years ago, but hasn't for years, you'd be ok with that person babysitting your kids? Or even better, would you let turtle dogsit or catsit for you while you went on a 10-day cruise, knowing he abused animals as an adolescent? very curious to hear your (HONEST) answers to these questions - not because I want to tear them apart, but because you seem like a smart guy and you just might have something to teach me. Maybe I do see things too much in black and white. Sorry, one more thing. You said in your response to me that you’re not so interested in who turtle was 15 years ago, it’s the man he is today that counts for you. Okay….so if someone molested a child 15 years ago, but hasn’t for years, you’d be ok with that person babysitting your kids? Or even better, would you let turtle dogsit or catsit for you while you went on a 10-day cruise, knowing he abused animals as an adolescent? very curious to hear your (HONEST) answers to these questions – not because I want to tear them apart, but because you seem like a smart guy and you just might have something to teach me. Maybe I do see things too much in black and white.

]]> By: tiger http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-79048 tiger Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:08:31 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-79048 i don't assume that i know everything. Where did that come from? I just stated what I saw was happening in the exchange between you and turtle, the lack of other comments, and my interpretation of it. I just don't understand why you, Max, are so quick to banish to hell not just the animal abusers on here, whether they be adults or adolescents (like turtle was), along with the child molesters and rapists, but ALSO when friends/relatives of the abuser come on PYSIH and attempt to stick up for their relative or friend, JUST LIKE you are sticking up for turtle, you call them fuckheads and ignorant slimeballs and other variations of these insults and banish them to hell along with their abuser friend or family member. THAT is what gets to me. I see nothing wrong with you sticking up for turtle. If a real life friend (not sure about an online friend, but...) admitted as much to me, of course I wouldn't stop being their friend. But I'd also ask them questions, and try to gauge if there' any chance they are still partaking in those behaviors or having nefarious thoughts about hurting anyone or anything. So you giving turtle a pass wasn't the complete problem. It's that anyone else who comes on here and tries to explain their family member-criminal's situation or admits that yes, they still love their brother or son or friend, gets the 3rd degree here, by you and others. so why is it ok for you to so easily forgive turtle, but the friends of perps on here cannot do the same without being called names and being subjected to a verbal beatdown? So see, that's where that word "hypocrite" entered my mind when thinking of you, max. I don't think I know everything, I am just calling it like I see it. And it obviously hit a chord with you or you wouldn't have responded. I'm not trying to start a fight here, and i love most of your writing and comments. But the exchange above just really bothered me. I saw inconsistencies in your beliefs, and I called it as I saw it. That said, sorry if my first two comments came across as a bit harsh. It was just after 7am here in NYC, I just woke up, and i'm always super grumpy when I first arise. But I am anxious to hear why you can forgive an online friend so easily for a crime he committed that you yourself have said is the most despicable to you (hurting helpless creatures), yet you insult the families and friends of people who are profiled here on pysih when they come on to essentially do the same thing. i don’t assume that i know everything. Where did that come from? I just stated what I saw was happening in the exchange between you and turtle, the lack of other comments, and my interpretation of it. I just don’t understand why you, Max, are so quick to banish to hell not just the animal abusers on here, whether they be adults or adolescents (like turtle was), along with the child molesters and rapists, but ALSO when friends/relatives of the abuser come on PYSIH and attempt to stick up for their relative or friend, JUST LIKE you are sticking up for turtle, you call them fuckheads and ignorant slimeballs and other variations of these insults and banish them to hell along with their abuser friend or family member. THAT is what gets to me. I see nothing wrong with you sticking up for turtle. If a real life friend (not sure about an online friend, but…) admitted as much to me, of course I wouldn’t stop being their friend. But I’d also ask them questions, and try to gauge if there’ any chance they are still partaking in those behaviors or having nefarious thoughts about hurting anyone or anything. So you giving turtle a pass wasn’t the complete problem. It’s that anyone else who comes on here and tries to explain their family member-criminal’s situation or admits that yes, they still love their brother or son or friend, gets the 3rd degree here, by you and others. so why is it ok for you to so easily forgive turtle, but the friends of perps on here cannot do the same without being called names and being subjected to a verbal beatdown? So see, that’s where that word “hypocrite” entered my mind when thinking of you, max. I don’t think I know everything, I am just calling it like I see it. And it obviously hit a chord with you or you wouldn’t have responded. I’m not trying to start a fight here, and i love most of your writing and comments. But the exchange above just really bothered me. I saw inconsistencies in your beliefs, and I called it as I saw it. That said, sorry if my first two comments came across as a bit harsh. It was just after 7am here in NYC, I just woke up, and i’m always super grumpy when I first arise. But I am anxious to hear why you can forgive an online friend so easily for a crime he committed that you yourself have said is the most despicable to you (hurting helpless creatures), yet you insult the families and friends of people who are profiled here on pysih when they come on to essentially do the same thing.

]]> By: Max The Cat http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-79044 Max The Cat Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:46:51 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-79044 When your friend decides to admit something to you that's been on his mind, something that happened when he was just a kid, and did under a certain amount of peer pressure (Oh, you didn't know that? See what happens when you stick your nose in other people's business without knowing all the facts) how would you react? Would you kick him to the curb, or would you try to show him some understanding. Doesn't all the good he's done count for something? For me, it about the man he is today, not the kid he was 15 or twenty years ago. And he's a good man, who cares about the victims of the people we write about, and the animals that have been abused too. You look at a handful of posts and think you know him, and us? Who the fuck do you think you are? I'd like to point out that it's you that's coming across as a asshole right now, not me and my friends. I feel sorry for you - your friendships must be quite superficial if you can't understand why we reacted the way we did to Turtle's admissions.I'm fine with the way I handled this. I'm much more interested in how he behaves today, and he's never disappointed me there. Perhaps it's you who should do a bit of re-evaluating - as in the wisdom of assuming that you know everything. When your friend decides to admit something to you that’s been on his mind, something that happened when he was just a kid, and did under a certain amount of peer pressure (Oh, you didn’t know that? See what happens when you stick your nose in other people’s business without knowing all the facts) how would you react? Would you kick him to the curb, or would you try to show him some understanding. Doesn’t all the good he’s done count for something?

For me, it about the man he is today, not the kid he was 15 or twenty years ago. And he’s a good man, who cares about the victims of the people we write about, and the animals that have been abused too. You look at a handful of posts and think you know him, and us? Who the fuck do you think you are? I’d like to point out that it’s you that’s coming across as a asshole right now, not me and my friends.

I feel sorry for you – your friendships must be quite superficial if you can’t understand why we reacted the way we did to Turtle’s admissions.I’m fine with the way I handled this. I’m much more interested in how he behaves today, and he’s never disappointed me there. Perhaps it’s you who should do a bit of re-evaluating – as in the wisdom of assuming that you know everything.

]]> By: tiger http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-79040 tiger Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:31:17 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-79040 Oh, and one more thing. I can't believe (literally cant believe) I'm the only person who notice this little exchange above between turtlemania and max that i just commented upon. Instead methinks the other friends in your 'clique' (amy, mazzi, etc) just chose to ignore it, especially turtlemania's initial comment wherein he admitted to hurting animals as an adolescent ''out of curiosity", because they didn't want to create any tensions or possibly even 'gasp' lose the comaraderie they have with another member of their 'clique'. so instead of there being dozens of comments chastising turtlemania for his past abuse of animals and telling him to get help, we only have max's lone 'its ok bro, i was using so much back then i prob wouldn't a been able to a do nuthin anyway!" response. How ridiculous and hypocritical. and sad. Turtlemania just admitted to abusing animals out of curiosity. We all wait know what that leads to 99 percent of the time - psychopathy or sociopathy! Oh but wait, turtlemania goes on to say 'but I'm not psycho', Oh, I see! But wait, how do we know that? How do we know turtlemania isn't still torturing animals? How do we know he hasn't progressed to children? After all, you guys have NO IDEA WHO HE REALLY IS. He could be one of the people that have been written about on PYSIH, for all we know. What, just because he's part of your PYSIH commenting clique he couldn't possibly be a psycho animal abuser or child molester NOW? sorry for my rant. But a frequent commenter to this blog just admitted a few comments above this one that he tortured and hurt animals as an adolescent 'out of curiosity'. Uh, readers, those are the kinds of people we banish to hell here on this blog, yet you conveniently ignore that comment and the one below it by Max which basically consists of him giving turtlemania a pass. Why? Because you don't want to lose friends on this blog. Fucking hypocrites. Again, turtlemania belongs in hell with andrew castor up there, and if he tortured animals as a kid I think there's a very good chance he is still doing so or even more likely has progressed to small humans. Max, amy, mazzi, whiteiris and the rest of your clique might want to re-evaluate having him as an online 'buddy' or as max called him 'bro'. Oh, and one more thing. I can’t believe (literally cant believe) I’m the only person who notice this little exchange above between turtlemania and max that i just commented upon. Instead methinks the other friends in your ‘clique’ (amy, mazzi, etc) just chose to ignore it, especially turtlemania’s initial comment wherein he admitted to hurting animals as an adolescent ”out of curiosity”, because they didn’t want to create any tensions or possibly even ‘gasp’ lose the comaraderie they have with another member of their ‘clique’. so instead of there being dozens of comments chastising turtlemania for his past abuse of animals and telling him to get help, we only have max’s lone ‘its ok bro, i was using so much back then i prob wouldn’t a been able to a do nuthin anyway!” response. How ridiculous and hypocritical. and sad. Turtlemania just admitted to abusing animals out of curiosity. We all wait know what that leads to 99 percent of the time – psychopathy or sociopathy! Oh but wait, turtlemania goes on to say ‘but I’m not psycho’, Oh, I see! But wait, how do we know that? How do we know turtlemania isn’t still torturing animals? How do we know he hasn’t progressed to children? After all, you guys have NO IDEA WHO HE REALLY IS. He could be one of the people that have been written about on PYSIH, for all we know. What, just because he’s part of your PYSIH commenting clique he couldn’t possibly be a psycho animal abuser or child molester NOW?

sorry for my rant. But a frequent commenter to this blog just admitted a few comments above this one that he tortured and hurt animals as an adolescent ‘out of curiosity’. Uh, readers, those are the kinds of people we banish to hell here on this blog, yet you conveniently ignore that comment and the one below it by Max which basically consists of him giving turtlemania a pass. Why? Because you don’t want to lose friends on this blog. Fucking hypocrites. Again, turtlemania belongs in hell with andrew castor up there, and if he tortured animals as a kid I think there’s a very good chance he is still doing so or even more likely has progressed to small humans. Max, amy, mazzi, whiteiris and the rest of your clique might want to re-evaluate having him as an online ‘buddy’ or as max called him ‘bro’.

]]> By: tiger http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-79039 tiger Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:10:35 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-79039 Uh, 'turtlemania' guy admitted to hurting animals as an adolescent, in the comment above. Yet you show no anger and continue to call him 'bro', Max? Interesting. I thought you had no tolerance or people who hurt animals or other innocent, helpless creatures. Oh wait, but instead of chastisting turtlemania or wishing him to hell for all the helpless animals he hurt, even if it was years ago, you call him bro and include "lol" in your return comment? Fucking hypocrite. If you'll give your 'online' friends a pass for their past transgressions with helpless creatures, i can't imagine the pass you'd give to your real friends for such crimes. yet many times on here you've banished the friends and families of perps to hell for sticking up for their slimeball relatives. again, fucking hypocrite. apparently it's ok with max that turtlemania abused animals as an adolescent. hmmm. interesting. Max, you're a hypocrite and have bendable ethics. Turtlemania, you belong in hell with castor up there for all the animals you tortured or hurt as a kid. fuck you both. Uh, ‘turtlemania’ guy admitted to hurting animals as an adolescent, in the comment above. Yet you show no anger and continue to call him ‘bro’, Max? Interesting. I thought you had no tolerance or people who hurt animals or other innocent, helpless creatures. Oh wait, but instead of chastisting turtlemania or wishing him to hell for all the helpless animals he hurt, even if it was years ago, you call him bro and include “lol” in your return comment? Fucking hypocrite. If you’ll give your ‘online’ friends a pass for their past transgressions with helpless creatures, i can’t imagine the pass you’d give to your real friends for such crimes. yet many times on here you’ve banished the friends and families of perps to hell for sticking up for their slimeball relatives. again, fucking hypocrite. apparently it’s ok with max that turtlemania abused animals as an adolescent. hmmm. interesting.

Max, you’re a hypocrite and have bendable ethics. Turtlemania, you belong in hell with castor up there for all the animals you tortured or hurt as a kid. fuck you both.

]]> By: AgJu http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-57314 AgJu Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:53:00 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-57314 Castrate him simply for the cat thing. That's where I really got pissed. Then the murder on top of that? All because he was bored? Why didn't he just kill himself? Castrate him simply for the cat thing. That’s where I really got pissed.

Then the murder on top of that? All because he was bored? Why didn’t he just kill himself?

]]> By: Chuck (again... why the fuck not?) http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-48721 Chuck (again... why the fuck not?) Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:08:27 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-48721 Sitting here on the couch in Alaska (thank you molly, now they know where i am *paranoia attack*) with deadbeat #2 (now former deadbeat, henceforth known as Jesse.) We can answer any and all questions relating to the weeping bag of pestulant filth (AJ), and possibly just say shit that pops into our heads, mostly pertaining to our very vivid imaginings of what should, would (and, if he isn't convicted and we can get plane tickets in time, will) happen to the little shit. Also, two things i forgot to mention, one: the vehicle wasn't ditched at a country club, country club blvd was the street's name, and it was far from that ironic name. two: he wasn't socio or psychopathic. i have been diagnosed with the exact disorders many claim to have AFTER they kill some one (does that mean i get a freebie? maybe in the netherlands...) he was simply an idiot, a pedophile, and, after talking shit to myself and jesse, pulling weapons on either of us, and being severly... *cough*... "repremanded" for it, proved to be a, shall we say, "individual of lesser testosterone levels". to answer the point made in the article, "If you’re wondering why they didn’t run for the hills upon learning this, we can’t figure it out either", he threatened jesse, and he whipped AJ's tubby ass. this was while i wasn't around, because after trying to do it to me (and jesse will confirm this) i put the fear of GOD into the little man not worth the now deceased mikey jackson's cockrot. (fans of mj, i would apologize for the previous statement, but... i'm an unabashed, unrepentant asshole. suck it.) Sitting here on the couch in Alaska (thank you molly, now they know where i am *paranoia attack*) with deadbeat #2 (now former deadbeat, henceforth known as Jesse.) We can answer any and all questions relating to the weeping bag of pestulant filth (AJ), and possibly just say shit that pops into our heads, mostly pertaining to our very vivid imaginings of what should, would (and, if he isn’t convicted and we can get plane tickets in time, will) happen to the little shit. Also, two things i forgot to mention, one: the vehicle wasn’t ditched at a country club, country club blvd was the street’s name, and it was far from that ironic name. two: he wasn’t socio or psychopathic. i have been diagnosed with the exact disorders many claim to have AFTER they kill some one (does that mean i get a freebie? maybe in the netherlands…) he was simply an idiot, a pedophile, and, after talking shit to myself and jesse, pulling weapons on either of us, and being severly… *cough*… “repremanded” for it, proved to be a, shall we say, “individual of lesser testosterone levels”. to answer the point made in the article, “If you’re wondering why they didn’t run for the hills upon learning this, we can’t figure it out either”, he threatened jesse, and he whipped AJ’s tubby ass. this was while i wasn’t around, because after trying to do it to me (and jesse will confirm this) i put the fear of GOD into the little man not worth the now deceased mikey jackson’s cockrot. (fans of mj, i would apologize for the previous statement, but… i’m an unabashed, unrepentant asshole. suck it.)

]]> By: Moop http://pysih.com/2008/08/08/andrew-castor/#comment-46229 Moop Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:37:42 +0000 http://pysih.com/?p=1583#comment-46229 ...stalker talk.... …stalker talk….

]]>