<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justin Lloyd Sharp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of evil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam S</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-116857</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 03:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-116857</guid>
		<description>Where does it even mention religion? You can&#039;t blame religion, for the most part, it&#039;s who you are as a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does it even mention religion? You can&#8217;t blame religion, for the most part, it&#8217;s who you are as a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NavyCop</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-116847</link>
		<dc:creator>NavyCop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-116847</guid>
		<description>We can&#039;t lay the blame on religion. The Middle East situation was caused by evil men mistranslating and misrepresenting the Quran to uneducated, easily manipulated people in their care. 
Derek is a product of manipulation and hate, which he learned to emulate from people he respected.
The root cause of any conflict, crime, hateful act, etc is people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can&#8217;t lay the blame on religion. The Middle East situation was caused by evil men mistranslating and misrepresenting the Quran to uneducated, easily manipulated people in their care.<br />
Derek is a product of manipulation and hate, which he learned to emulate from people he respected.<br />
The root cause of any conflict, crime, hateful act, etc is people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wow</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-116826</link>
		<dc:creator>Wow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-116826</guid>
		<description>This Derek Prudence person is pretty fucked up. That&#039;s what religion does to people though; just look at the Middle East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Derek Prudence person is pretty fucked up. That&#8217;s what religion does to people though; just look at the Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vcbecky</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-104944</link>
		<dc:creator>vcbecky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-104944</guid>
		<description>Your definition of &#039;perversion&#039; is not a logical one, nor is it something that anyone else should take to heart.  You appear to be a thinking person, but appearances can be deceiving.  Intelligence can be clouded by fear and hate, which is why we have things like &#039;logic&#039;, &#039;compassion&#039;, &quot;ethics&quot; and other exclusively human tools.  These are tools you appear to lack.  In my experience, most well-grounded, intelligent people would vehemently disagree with your attempts to force such subjects into solid shapes to fit your worldview.  Then again... Hitler...

There are always shades of black and white when it comes to &#039;good&#039; and &#039;evil&#039;.  Very few criminals are completely evil, even if what they did is horrible.  Evil will wipe out any good they did, sure, but that doesn&#039;t mean that they NEVER did good.  Shades of gray help define certain aspects of human thinking, if you understand what I mean. We don&#039;t really deal much with them on this website, but they do exist and only an infant would imply otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your definition of &#8216;perversion&#8217; is not a logical one, nor is it something that anyone else should take to heart.  You appear to be a thinking person, but appearances can be deceiving.  Intelligence can be clouded by fear and hate, which is why we have things like &#8216;logic&#8217;, &#8216;compassion&#8217;, &#8220;ethics&#8221; and other exclusively human tools.  These are tools you appear to lack.  In my experience, most well-grounded, intelligent people would vehemently disagree with your attempts to force such subjects into solid shapes to fit your worldview.  Then again&#8230; Hitler&#8230;</p>
<p>There are always shades of black and white when it comes to &#8216;good&#8217; and &#8216;evil&#8217;.  Very few criminals are completely evil, even if what they did is horrible.  Evil will wipe out any good they did, sure, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that they NEVER did good.  Shades of gray help define certain aspects of human thinking, if you understand what I mean. We don&#8217;t really deal much with them on this website, but they do exist and only an infant would imply otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vcbecky</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-104940</link>
		<dc:creator>vcbecky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-104940</guid>
		<description>All of this time, I thought &#039;SEX&#039; meant more than just FUCKING when it comes to social terminology.  BOY was I wrong!  You sure have done your research, delved deep, and contemplated the infinite.  You have spread it all out here in crystal-clear perfection.  No one could possibly go against the solid facts you have to back up your reasoning.  Are you running for Emperor?  Because I would sure like to vote for you, sir.

I really should go get an engineering degree.  Apparently it is the key to understanding the universe.  I am reminded of a certain Futurama episode... &quot;Whale Biologist, stand aside!&quot;

You don&#039;t have to be a Christian to be a nut.  You are welcome to your opinion, but to present your opinion as facts based on these ridiculous links is laughable, if not silly as hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this time, I thought &#8216;SEX&#8217; meant more than just FUCKING when it comes to social terminology.  BOY was I wrong!  You sure have done your research, delved deep, and contemplated the infinite.  You have spread it all out here in crystal-clear perfection.  No one could possibly go against the solid facts you have to back up your reasoning.  Are you running for Emperor?  Because I would sure like to vote for you, sir.</p>
<p>I really should go get an engineering degree.  Apparently it is the key to understanding the universe.  I am reminded of a certain Futurama episode&#8230; &#8220;Whale Biologist, stand aside!&#8221;</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to be a Christian to be a nut.  You are welcome to your opinion, but to present your opinion as facts based on these ridiculous links is laughable, if not silly as hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Prudence</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-104926</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Prudence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-104926</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, and there is no such thing as &quot;sexual orientation&quot; or &quot;bi-sexual&quot;, they are nice labels designed to introduce confusion.  if you understand my post, there is only normal and perverted.  If you accept the nice labels, then it is only a matter of time when &quot;sexual orientation to children&quot; and &quot;... to animals&quot; is acceptable.

Decent scientific article:
____http://www.narth.com/docs/whitehead.html

The wedge, with the thick bits exposed.  Take what you like and leave the rest (ignore the Christian flavour).  Take special note of the &quot;justification&quot; of paedophilia and incest (Hindus and Muslims agree with Christians and Jews, all such acts and justification is evil):
____http://www.bibleprobe.com/homosexuality.htm

The sons of satan are, well, satanic.  ANd his daughters are even worse:
____http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality_and_Murders
____http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_Couples_and_Domestic_Violence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, and there is no such thing as &#8220;sexual orientation&#8221; or &#8220;bi-sexual&#8221;, they are nice labels designed to introduce confusion.  if you understand my post, there is only normal and perverted.  If you accept the nice labels, then it is only a matter of time when &#8220;sexual orientation to children&#8221; and &#8220;&#8230; to animals&#8221; is acceptable.</p>
<p>Decent scientific article:<br />
____http://www.narth.com/docs/whitehead.html</p>
<p>The wedge, with the thick bits exposed.  Take what you like and leave the rest (ignore the Christian flavour).  Take special note of the &#8220;justification&#8221; of paedophilia and incest (Hindus and Muslims agree with Christians and Jews, all such acts and justification is evil):<br />
____http://www.bibleprobe.com/homosexuality.htm</p>
<p>The sons of satan are, well, satanic.  ANd his daughters are even worse:<br />
____http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality_and_Murders<br />
____http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_Couples_and_Domestic_Violence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Prudence</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-104924</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Prudence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-104924</guid>
		<description>Look, if we are going to make a dent in the child abuse (or animal abuse) stats, we have to break through a lot of fuzzy stuff.  And please, the women and children are more important than animals, much as I love them.  Society has degenerated, in part because of introduced (and then commonly accepted) fuzziness, about subjects that used to be crystal clear.

Actually, the difference between good and evil is a clear solid line.  There is no fuzziness or shades of grey.  The powers that control society have been purposely introducing (a) fuzziness and (b) tolerance of contradiction in the same cranial space, with the explicit purpose of degrading society, demeaning religion, and increasing anarchy and suffering.  Here I will deal with one item of said fuzziness.

There is no such thing as &quot;having sex&quot; with an animal.  No.  One party *might* be performing their perverted version of &quot;having sex&quot;, but the other party is definitely not having sex.  Sex is a mutual act, that only happens between two conscious, consenting adults of opposite gender.  It is the human equivalent, and one step above the mating that animals do, engaging the senses and experiences that humans exclusively have.

If one party is not legally capable of consent, such as a child or an animal or a drunk adult, it is not &quot;sex&quot;, it is statutory rape.  If it is two adults, but one does not consent, it is rape.  

This is sick abuse, pure and simple, of both parties (ok, the party on the receiving end is &quot;more&quot; abused).

1.  If one creature is an animal, the word is bestiality.

2.  If one party is a child, the word is rape and paedophilia.  Molesting is also a correct word, but only when the attack is non-penetrating (as if that were not horrible enough).

3.  If the two adults are the same sex (whether they consent or not), the word is sodomy.  The original meaning of sodomy was same sex activity, not just anal intercourse, which it has become now.  Even animals need one male organ and one female organ to copulate.  So do humans.  

4.  If one person is dead, the word is necrophilia.  It is not possible to &quot;have sex&quot; with a corpse.

Using the word &quot;sex&quot; or the term &quot;having sex&quot; for any of the above, has two serious and damaging consequences.  First, it demeans the word sex, which is a wonderful thing.  Second, it elevates the said perverted vile actions, performed by very sick people (are they human beings ?), above the animal actions that it actually is.

So here is my point.  Labels are very important.  I do not need to spend ten grand with a therapist to find that out, I know this from my engineering background.  The first step in solving *any* problem, is to identify it accurately.  The corollary is, of course, that we impede our ability to solve the problem when we name it incorrectly, by using nice labels, by elevating the vile act to something that it isn&#039;t; something that is acceptable to people.

Try reading the story, replacing every occurrence of &quot;having sex with a dog&quot; with &quot;committing bestiality&quot;, notice the difference in effect.  The guy is a total pervert, a sociopath who cannot relate to humans, he has to copulate with animals.  He has regressed to being a beast.  There is no &quot;having sex&quot; anywhere in that.  At the rate he is going, he is never going to have sex, the only women who will entertain him are those who are tolerant of bestiality, beasts themselves.

Now, it is a separate point that some people cannot have normal sex, and they need perversions of all kinds, from pornography to anal penetration to eating shit to violence to exhibitionists to voyeurs to stealing underwear, etc.  And now we have the virtual world of &quot;phone sex&quot; with an absent &quot;partner&quot;.  Hilarious.  Sad.  Ok, they need help, but let&#039;s not call their perversions something else, let&#039;s not elevate them to &quot;sex&quot;. And let&#039;s not stop calling it  a perversion.

And finally, the line between good and evil is very clear.  Once one is on the other side, whether it is &quot;small&quot; perversion or a &quot;big&quot; one, unless it gets addressed (after having named it), it will progress to really big perversions such as sadistic rape and murder.  The pages here and elsewhere are full of evidence.

Another way of stating that is, everyone on the other side of the thin blue line is going to Hell.  Not just the baby killers.

The acceptance of homosexuality is the thin edge of the wedge.  There is now mounting evidence that homosexuality was removed from DSM IV classification due to lobbying, and not as a result of scientific research.  Greater minds than mine have done serious research and written books on the subject.  The devil worshippers will tell you that there&#039;s something wrong with me for not accepting a perverted mind.  Excuse me, there is something seriously wrong with the devil, and anyone who worships him.

And I am not &quot;homophobic&quot; just because I do not accept it as normal.  Phobia is an irrational fear; my rejection contains no fear, only disgust.  it is the homosexuals who fear people like me, and try to pervert the clarity.  

Sorry if I sound like a bible-basher, I am not Christian.  However, all great religions have the exact same principles and purpose in common, to maintain the connection between us and our creator. Anything or anyone who interferes with that is evil, from Hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, if we are going to make a dent in the child abuse (or animal abuse) stats, we have to break through a lot of fuzzy stuff.  And please, the women and children are more important than animals, much as I love them.  Society has degenerated, in part because of introduced (and then commonly accepted) fuzziness, about subjects that used to be crystal clear.</p>
<p>Actually, the difference between good and evil is a clear solid line.  There is no fuzziness or shades of grey.  The powers that control society have been purposely introducing (a) fuzziness and (b) tolerance of contradiction in the same cranial space, with the explicit purpose of degrading society, demeaning religion, and increasing anarchy and suffering.  Here I will deal with one item of said fuzziness.</p>
<p>There is no such thing as &#8220;having sex&#8221; with an animal.  No.  One party *might* be performing their perverted version of &#8220;having sex&#8221;, but the other party is definitely not having sex.  Sex is a mutual act, that only happens between two conscious, consenting adults of opposite gender.  It is the human equivalent, and one step above the mating that animals do, engaging the senses and experiences that humans exclusively have.</p>
<p>If one party is not legally capable of consent, such as a child or an animal or a drunk adult, it is not &#8220;sex&#8221;, it is statutory rape.  If it is two adults, but one does not consent, it is rape.  </p>
<p>This is sick abuse, pure and simple, of both parties (ok, the party on the receiving end is &#8220;more&#8221; abused).</p>
<p>1.  If one creature is an animal, the word is bestiality.</p>
<p>2.  If one party is a child, the word is rape and paedophilia.  Molesting is also a correct word, but only when the attack is non-penetrating (as if that were not horrible enough).</p>
<p>3.  If the two adults are the same sex (whether they consent or not), the word is sodomy.  The original meaning of sodomy was same sex activity, not just anal intercourse, which it has become now.  Even animals need one male organ and one female organ to copulate.  So do humans.  </p>
<p>4.  If one person is dead, the word is necrophilia.  It is not possible to &#8220;have sex&#8221; with a corpse.</p>
<p>Using the word &#8220;sex&#8221; or the term &#8220;having sex&#8221; for any of the above, has two serious and damaging consequences.  First, it demeans the word sex, which is a wonderful thing.  Second, it elevates the said perverted vile actions, performed by very sick people (are they human beings ?), above the animal actions that it actually is.</p>
<p>So here is my point.  Labels are very important.  I do not need to spend ten grand with a therapist to find that out, I know this from my engineering background.  The first step in solving *any* problem, is to identify it accurately.  The corollary is, of course, that we impede our ability to solve the problem when we name it incorrectly, by using nice labels, by elevating the vile act to something that it isn&#8217;t; something that is acceptable to people.</p>
<p>Try reading the story, replacing every occurrence of &#8220;having sex with a dog&#8221; with &#8220;committing bestiality&#8221;, notice the difference in effect.  The guy is a total pervert, a sociopath who cannot relate to humans, he has to copulate with animals.  He has regressed to being a beast.  There is no &#8220;having sex&#8221; anywhere in that.  At the rate he is going, he is never going to have sex, the only women who will entertain him are those who are tolerant of bestiality, beasts themselves.</p>
<p>Now, it is a separate point that some people cannot have normal sex, and they need perversions of all kinds, from pornography to anal penetration to eating shit to violence to exhibitionists to voyeurs to stealing underwear, etc.  And now we have the virtual world of &#8220;phone sex&#8221; with an absent &#8220;partner&#8221;.  Hilarious.  Sad.  Ok, they need help, but let&#8217;s not call their perversions something else, let&#8217;s not elevate them to &#8220;sex&#8221;. And let&#8217;s not stop calling it  a perversion.</p>
<p>And finally, the line between good and evil is very clear.  Once one is on the other side, whether it is &#8220;small&#8221; perversion or a &#8220;big&#8221; one, unless it gets addressed (after having named it), it will progress to really big perversions such as sadistic rape and murder.  The pages here and elsewhere are full of evidence.</p>
<p>Another way of stating that is, everyone on the other side of the thin blue line is going to Hell.  Not just the baby killers.</p>
<p>The acceptance of homosexuality is the thin edge of the wedge.  There is now mounting evidence that homosexuality was removed from DSM IV classification due to lobbying, and not as a result of scientific research.  Greater minds than mine have done serious research and written books on the subject.  The devil worshippers will tell you that there&#8217;s something wrong with me for not accepting a perverted mind.  Excuse me, there is something seriously wrong with the devil, and anyone who worships him.</p>
<p>And I am not &#8220;homophobic&#8221; just because I do not accept it as normal.  Phobia is an irrational fear; my rejection contains no fear, only disgust.  it is the homosexuals who fear people like me, and try to pervert the clarity.  </p>
<p>Sorry if I sound like a bible-basher, I am not Christian.  However, all great religions have the exact same principles and purpose in common, to maintain the connection between us and our creator. Anything or anyone who interferes with that is evil, from Hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittani</title>
		<link>http://pysih.com/2008/08/28/justin-lloyd-sharp/#comment-80271</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pysih.com/?p=1669#comment-80271</guid>
		<description>I realize this comment is 2 years old, but I just got around to this article today, and the combination of &quot;The Dog Whisperer&quot; and &quot;Dr. Phil&quot; bit made me literally LOL! : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this comment is 2 years old, but I just got around to this article today, and the combination of &#8220;The Dog Whisperer&#8221; and &#8220;Dr. Phil&#8221; bit made me literally LOL! : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/12 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 442/443 objects using disk: basic

Served from: pysih.com @ 2012-02-10 22:56:33 -->
