1. The legal cause
2. The physical cause
3. The moral cause

His legal cause was unmonitored access, combined with morbid interest, connected with deviant action, leading to a criminal assault.

His physical cause (which includes his psychological cause) was lack or limited inhibition, fetish, unmet desire, and instinctual arousal.

His moral cause was lack of context, lack of inhibition and lack of alternate purpose(defending the child is usually a moral cause).

If you’d like to tie some societal institution to this, Noam Chomsky has spent thousands of pages doing it poorly. Causality is going to be a difficult argument to make to me or any others without finding some sort of conceded ground to solve this. You’re in luck, I’m a bleeding heart liberal, and have read the majority of the works associated with the topic, so if you’d like to crib off of the major names, you may annotate to their works.

Paul

Devaluating, degrading this individual to a sub human being, wishing him Hell and torture however, simply throws us a few hundred years back in history.

Devaluing and degrading him serves a distinctly human service. You don’t seem to understand how human minds form. Children and adults need to regularly be reminded of which society they belong to and the rules whenever either events trigger a reset of human norms or there’s no established set for the individual to grasp onto. If we go 100 years without a baby raping, we technically need an oral history of the last baby raper, to help reinforce that the action is wrong for people incapable of reasoning it out for themselves.

When will we realize that it is our society which triggers those people to do whatever they like.

It is our point of view regarding sexuality, nudity, we need to reconsider.

I defy you to find something “in” out society, that triggered this. Using behaviorism to describe his actions is dishonest both intellectually and factually. You’re trying to attack puritanism for this action, but that doesn’t excuse the action nor does it explain it.

As long as we stick to condemning those we wish not to identify with, seeing them as monsters, monstrous behaviour will remain a fact in our society.

Look up the etymology of Barbarian, Bugger, Vandal, Rape and Hooker.
The human race has successfully used pejorative words to identify something they despise about their group to define crimes, separate into subsets and navigate some fairly dangerous times in our developmental life cycle. These adaptations required the definition of demonstrably separating language. Rather than a throw back, hundreds of years, it’s a 6,000 + year, documented process of making the human race better through moralist progress.

Monster, for example, comes from the word to monitor and warn. It comes from a time of dogma regarding bad omens, but taking notice and curing a problem “demonstrably” comes from an evolution of our use of the words to define what is right and what is wrong.

We have been locking up and even executing people for centuries. Still it happens, we didn’t even succeed in decreasing this behaviour even for a bit.

You haven’t been paying attention to statistics then. It may happen, but the percentage of events to population fluctuates, is better reported and is dealt with better generationally.

Reading what this individual did, shocked me. Reading what we would like to do to him, shocked me even more.

Better the mob voices these concerns and considerations than they act on the impulse. Better a verbal and digital mob than an actual one. Better talking about it, rather than leaving it in the dark. There’s something instinctual about wanting to protect a baby and a girl from a monster. There’s something beautiful about compassion for a victim and the family of a victim. There remains a series of angry, brutal and unfortunate things about the way we speak to one another, but language is a knife that is sharpened with use and guided with patience. Your admonition is in fact derived from the same place as the insults these folk added. It’s the same place where my “correction” of you is derived. Take a mirror to your words and realize, that while you don’t advocate the death and torture of the suspect, you are not supporting the victim and instead are torturing the victim’s family and the eventual victim when you excuse her rapist’s actions by calling them cultural.

You don’t seem to understand what it is you’re doing, or you wouldn’t do it that way.

When will we realize that it is our society which triggers those people to do whatever they like.

It is our point of view regarding sexuality, nudity, we need to reconsider.

As long as we stick to condemning those we wish not to identify with, seeing them as monsters, monstrous behaviour will remain a fact in our society.

We have been locking up and even executing people for centuries. Still it happens, we didn’t even succeed in decreasing this behaviour even for a bit.

Reading what this individual did, shocked me. Reading what we would like to do to him, shocked me even more.

Paul

IT’SSS AWW-RIGHTTT!!!~~~~~~~